Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

jejejester

Members
  • Posts

    1,845
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by jejejester

  1. Yeah but I really thought Chicago would make something out of him
  2. I always thought stalberg could be a really good player. Guess I was wrong
  3. I think it happens a lot more than people realize.
  4. Today was a maintenance day for Richardson. Henrik remains day-to-day. -Sully Looks like he's not injured
  5. Looked like he got banged up last night. Also saw this tweet RT @ElliottPap: No Henrik at practice. No Brad Richardson. Jordan Schroeder between Booth and Kassian. Other 3 lines same as Edmonton game Possibly injured? Personal reasons? Also Van Canucks tweeted Practice underway in @RogersArena. No Henrik or Richardson on the ice.
  6. Don't all coaching suspension have to be in person? Even if it's just 1 game? I could see a big fine and a few game suspension, but no worries because the assistants can fill on no problem, they know the system.
  7. Very true, I could make a high lights package to make elder look like the best D man in the league. But when people see him play every night and have an emotional attachment they tend to pick out his faults.
  8. Ding Ding Ding CDC only watches and hates on edler. Having those guys on their team every night would drive them even more nuts. There are 29 GMS just hoping that a top 4 D like edler comes available, pair him with a RHD like erhoff or Salo, and elder is at his best again
  9. 2nd line players =/= Top 4 D People here hate on edler, but look at it from an outside prospective, and numbers. Also don't forget Avs had some "coho" like problems with him and his dad getting involved in negotiations Note this is only the 2nd time RoR has broken 30points. Not only did goligoski get James neal who was a top prospect and had 3/3 30+ point seasons, plus a 55 point season in his second year, they also get niskanen. Edler > goligoski
  10. Doesn't chi gets chance of grabbing Stanton through waivers if we try and trade him within a year?
  11. It's true, edler is a #3/4 D man. Those don't come into trade too often, they are worth more than a top 6 forward Edler for RoR straight up is a knock as socks off deal. Edler for RoR + is more value = value
  12. Mackinnon and Duchesne say hello as top 2 centers. Gardiner = tanev but < edler
  13. Now that would be the best case for this team. A line of RoR Kesler Wheeler, would be very nice. Could you move edler for RoR+ And use that + and a few pieces from our roster to get wheeler is the question, without sacrificing youth As far as edler's NTC, i believe if the right deal came buy, Canucks would ask him to waive, it is a business and players know that
  14. I agree that edler for RoR is a value for value trade, just hope he would waive his NTC.
  15. I look at O'Reilly as a step towards being able to beat cali teams, our future, and becoming cup contenders again. I'd say it will cost us Tanev, prospect, 2014 1st
  16. CDC wants Gillis to make a splash and get a top 6 player, with future potential. Rumors come out he is try to do this, CDC freaks out and says we already have that in our system in Horvat.... Getting O'Reilly would be huge for this team. And still allow Horvat to flourish as a 3rd line center until he is able to step up to a 2nd line C The deal will be based around Tanev, Canucks don't want to pay him top 4 money next year. They have a cheaper version in Corrado, who is ready IMO to step up and play full time next season.
  17. I think he would be an improvement to this team. Might help us against the dreaded cali teams
  18. It was a good game, got another bad bounce. This isn't our year anyways. On a side note RoR got some points vs the Ducks tonight. We could use that. Plus lack could be good enough to start for this team for a longer period
×
×
  • Create New...