Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

R3aL

Members
  • Posts

    8,850
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by R3aL

  1. Could see the rangers being more likely to trade Lafreniderriair for Debrincat rather than Garland lol That was such a funny idea garland for laf lol
  2. Yea we talked about it right after if you scroll down. I saw the shoutout to be neg vs ASP watched the clip far too quickly on my phone. And that was the most egregious part of the clip
  3. I just cant see us being able to afford Barbashev unless some serious cap is moved out and we acquire a cheap 3C and address our OEL replacement. That line would be interesting but I think if Barb was acquired he'd be playing with Petey and Kuzmenko most likely letting Mikehyev play with Miller and Beauvillier there on the third line. In your scenario.
  4. I was gonna say I think Lysell trade value is > than Hoglander and Swayman >>> Silovs without a doubt.
  5. Barb is an effective winger and not a good C though. So I hope not.
  6. I would be very okay with a Soucy bet. My concern would be though is he a solid bottom pairing, PK guy. Or could he be elevated and play top 4 minutes with a dman like Hronek. Perhaps stylistically they fit and he is capable of the tougher minutes when paired with him. But it is a gamble. And I would hope the term wouldn't be too long. Because if we trade for a LHD for Hronek and then sign Soucy for our bottom Pairing that would be pretty interesting.
  7. He was Alvins first draft pick. They believe in him as a player. I confidently believe they aren't trading him. If we do quote me and tell me im silly please!
  8. Ya I am not keen on Rossi at all. the article just scared me since the price for JT was said to be set at 2 1sts and if they liked Rossi he’d be a first in value that’s the price and it matches the ask. i just can’t imagine them wanting our 2C to be Rossi projecting EP40 Rossi Raty for our future C depth i dont think Rossi is dynamic enough. or a Tocchet guy
  9. Lol how would we all feel of it was JT MILLER for ROSSI + 21 overall
  10. minny biggest need is top 6 C.. Rossi is pretty small too. If we trade 11 in a package for him I’ll be very sad. because he technically should be NHL ready and of minny doesn’t want him when it’s a need of theirs that’s a red flag people worried about benson and Rossi a little smaller i think
  11. He has a lot of JT MILLER and Tkachuk in his game for sure. But we aren’t trading JL and our pick to move up for him I don’t think
  12. I didn’t know that about Michkov isnt miro considered to be a good kid? A good leader? would them fighting / arguing being more truth to the Michkov attitude / asshole stuff circulating lol i could see ovie signing a 1yr deal at least once though at the end brutal reference! Haha
  13. That’s an interesting look at it but they did draft miro and the symbolism of passing a torch from ovie to Michkov would be pretty cool
  14. Now that’s interesting.. if millstein was his agent we’d really be cooking cause he was all TRUST me vancouver big things are coming to van lol
  15. IF there's any targeted landing spot for Michkov it would be Washington no? Be funny if a GM before was jus like F this kid and his stupid plan we are taking him.
  16. That’s interesting. If that’s the case without Bobs list to cross reference: Bedard Fantilli Carlsson Smith Benson Reinbacher/Leonard Leonard/Reinbacher Michkov Dvorsky ASP / Danielson Willander / Wood
  17. Maybe Honzek but curious to see where wallinder and bensonnn are on it
  18. I can’t wait to see Bobs list!
  19. I feel bamboozled! watched it far too quickly before responding to it. wasn’t the best play by ASP but not that egregious
  20. he could for sure I don’t know who they took out for dinners or who took ASP out for dinner that would be interesting
  21. Snuggerud is very good in all fairness but ya stripped and out muscled rough that moment in that game aha
  22. Hronek was 1 year away from needing an extension and they have Seider as there number 1 RHD he probably didn’t want to shell out big money to 2 RHD at this current time in their window, and he was the older and Seider is a higher end option. Had an opportunity with the value meeting his trade requirements and he swung. it wouldn’t be too crazy to think he drafts 1 or 2 of: Simashev/Honzek/Wallinder And RHD are valuable trade assets why would he not draft okenbecause they traded Hronek I don’t understand? If anything it would give them greater reason to draft a new RHD to have in the system. also they draft 9th and 17th. They could take two forwards or they could take a d and a forward I wouldn’t be shocked if they took the best forward available at 9 and Bonk at 17 too
  23. Detroit gonna snag him to run Edvinsson-Seider Wallinder-Wallinder
  24. I think the difference is how Nate used his speed and made his line mates better. jake was just a one man show either would physically blow a guy up or just outskate them when mismatched and the goals scored he’s often just roof it clean. As we saw none of that translated. Nate does use his speed and reach to make plays but I think the fundamentals of using his speed to attack and back d up or using his reach to make it passes and or create different lanes will translate well as he adapts to the NHL. if he didn’t use his reach and speed we’d say he’s slow and doesn’t use his frame effectively . I don’t think we can fault him for using his tools. I don’t think he’s just a physical freak having his way with kids out there though. im still scared too. I honestly compared this aspect of jakes game to Barlow. Even though he’s much more of a complete player than JV he scores some goals similar to Jake just by being stronger and just sniping it clean on goalies and it makes me Nervous. JV PTSD 100%! really I agree with everything you said there except I do think he’s more creative then he’s given credit for. Because when he does hold the puck he does do it with a purpose. Whether it is too let his line mates catch up, or to pull d in to create more space for His line mates but either way it’s his way of making things easier for his line mates. And he makes some reslly creative plays and nice cheeky cross passes. he does have the north south style though for sure and he has the size and speed and IQ to be an effective north south match up C I think. well if he can smother bedard better than anyone in the dub that’s a great sign to me. i like dvorksys offensive game more than ND def and I like ND skating and Def play/potential more than.l dvorksy personally but there would be others to agree with you I’m sure like I’d compare peak Kesler more to Danielson and Horvat more to Dvorsky except I think Dvorksy will end up having a heavier style and need to improve his skating like Bo did and Danielson I don’t think will have Keslers pest / bite to him that kesler had
×
×
  • Create New...