The debate can be summed up in one of two ways. Bill Nye Destroyed Ken Ham with facts and evidence. Or, for the other side, Ken ham destroyed Bill Nye like the canucks did the Bruins tonight...oh wait
I didn't feel that Nye explained much of anything, I heard a lot of "I don't know/we can't possibly know that." At least Ham had an answer for it. In the end it's my opinion and how other people feel on the topic isn't going to change how I feel about it, or vice-versa.
Well said Rant. Honestly. Prove it without using the words in the bible.
He cannot, literally CANNOT provide a damned thing without resorting to a fairy tale book. It would be like a college physics prof resorting to Mother Goose to teach a class and calling themselves credible
Nye was honest when he said "I don't know" when it came to how the laws of physics or whatever came to be. And that is the appropriate way to answer because nobody does. Of course Ham "knew" the answer to that though, but couldn't ever show it to actually be true even if his life depended on it.