Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Me_

Members
  • Posts

    12,603
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Me_

  1. Man Jim Benning really messed up on that one. Puljujarvi was a Canucks in every way except, mentally physically and contractually and even if it was never even a thing... man Jim Benning really messed up on that one.
  2. So the Canucks went from \ to / and in its latest accomplishments, beat the Defending Stanley Cup Champions, and then took the supposed Stanley Cup Favorites for a Game 7 ride. Toffoli played one game against Minnesota on August 2, Did not play against St-Louis, And played 6 of the 7 games against the Knights. Benning and his team have brought bountiful success to this franchise already and we're just starting. Our boys grew a lot this year.
  3. Well the Canucks are still pretty stacked without Toffoli.
  4. Really more and more like the Kesler situation. It’s a hard one to swallow for Arizona.
  5. I say stay the course. Add Tryamkin and Podkolzin at the end of the season.
  6. Somehow I think Virtanen would love the free-going Arizona lifestyle. VAN OEL 1st ‘21 ARI Virtanen Juolevi Eriksson Arizona gets two first rounders in a power forward who just had the best year of his young career, and a defenseman who was surpassed by what May amount to the best defenseman in history yet. And Eriksson who is a $12 million cap hit but a $5 million dollar total payout for the next two years. Vancouver gets to “revamp” the defense and as compensation for taking on such a mass contract, is a 1st rounder. Flip either 1ARI21 or 1VAN21 at this year’s draft table. New Jersey and Ottawa have three 1st picks and the Rangers, Ducks and Minnesota hold two each. Or be that rich playoff team that holds two 1st rounders in 2021.
  7. Yeah really and what would it cost; not re-signing Tanev and cap dumping Sutter. For what assets go the other way...
  8. Then perhaps a Kesler-type deal then... Still too expensive. No way is Eriksson NOT. part of that deal.
  9. Not the type of assets the Yotes are apparently asking for... Don’t like it. Way too expensive.
  10. Why lose assets when Pietrangelo is available...
  11. The Canucks have other fish to fry. Dumping Eriksson Dumping Sutter Dumping Roussel Adding a 1st Adding a 2nd That is a great summer right there.
  12. ...but I like that Elkblad kid...
  13. Washed up goalie... or bridge goaltender who is less expensive than Markstrom to give another year to Demko to develop his game... Personally I’d have Markstrom/Demko back again.
  14. Man those were dark days. From McLean to Luongo. Just a big revolving door.
  15. MILLER - PETTERSSON - BOESER PEARSON - HORVAT - TOFFOLI MOTTE - GAUDETTE - VIRTANEN LEIVO - BEAGLE - McEWEN HUGHES - MYERS ____________ - EDLER STETCHER - FANTENBERG JUOLEVI DEMKO ____________ So the Canucks are looking for a T4D that is as good or better than Tanev, and a goaltender, either a grey beard like Holtby, or a legitimate backup goaltender?
  16. Man... Since Luongo was trade to Vancouver, the Canucks really discovered what a great goalie is. Luongo Miller Markstrom Demko Holtby
  17. Holtby is an intelligent man. He knows where the future is. Holtby has a Cup. That would be Toffoli, Pearson, Beagle and Holtby. Couldn't hurt...
×
×
  • Create New...