Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Batmania

Members
  • Posts

    2,393
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Batmania

  1. I never said it wasn't speculation. I don't know what trap you're trying to set but it's never worked for you in the past and won't work now. I'm speaking from a place of speculation.
  2. whaa A good point is a point. That was speculation. There's a difference I don't get to decide that.
  3. Common sense suggests they don't just have one camera pointed at half a door. They will have security cameras throughout the building. We know that because we see footage from all over the buildings randomly on broadcasts. It's also common practice for the league to request all footage when they have a disciplinary hearing. Somebody the other day here posted something regarding the league making a "request" It's not a safety concern so we know Shanahan won't be involved. This is a hearing about conduct but they would still want all the footage. They won't just turn on a DVR to the CBC footage of the game. (although I also wouldn't be surprised by anything from these clowns.)
  4. He should have been by the rules. Most refs are reasonably unaware of most things going on on the ice so I can't pretend to be surprised they're clueless about off the ice.
  5. Not really. It's an interesting speculation at best. We know there are cameras everywhere and the league has likely asked for them all. CBC was only given one feed or chose to use one feed but I'm sure there are more and we know the league has asked for all footage.
  6. Well he shouldn't have been allowed to finish the last game so maybe the 3rd game will be to make up for that. I dunno. I don't think 3 is excessive. 2 is right but 3 isn't far off.
  7. Hartley is a douche and he coaches like one but he didn't go over to the other teams dressing room. Torts went to far and even though I understand why that doesn't make it right.
  8. What do you think it would take to pull Jagr and Ryder from the Devils at the deadline?

    1. Show previous comments  3 more
    2. Nicklas Bo Hunter

      Nicklas Bo Hunter

      2 wins in the last 10 games.... one against one of the worst teams in overtime... come on we don't look like a

      playoff team.

    3. Batmania

      Batmania

      and before that what was the record NBH? Yeah, things happen and things change. We win a next game or two and no more talk about missing the playoffs from the mouth breathers of CDC that blow whatever direction the wind takes them. /yawn.

      So what would it take to get those 2 guys?

    4. Nicklas Bo Hunter

      Nicklas Bo Hunter

      it would take prospects and picks which mg is not willing to give up. and for the record I said we were going to be out of the playoffs at the beginning of the year... we are in the toughest division and just are not as good as we sed to be its time to get younger not older with these players.

  9. Yeah you weren't paying attention because that's not at all what happened.
  10. I have really noticed that when they go on a win streak you do everything you can to defend them. When they go on a losing streak you start doing this homer glasses crap.
  11. Are you seriously comparing the situation tonight with your hypothetical? Look you're wrong. Just admit it rather than dig an even deeper hole. Happens to the best of us and it's happening to you right now.
  12. Did Friedman just basically tell Stock his opinion doesn't matter?

    1. Green Building

      Green Building

      Damn! Missed it! First Healy then Pajamas, Friedman tells it like it is!

    2. King Heffy

      King Heffy

      Hopefully Friedman and Hughson are the only CBC guys who Rogers doesn't fire.

  13. Nice. Thank you for sharing the link. When I have some more time I'm going to take I look.
  14. Hyperbole at it's finest. or maybe worst.
  15. This is how I felt too. I watched it a second time and it felt to be like somebody was trying to fabricate a Coen brothers movie. I don't dislike it at all. In fact I still think it's pretty good but it didn't grab me at all. A little too precious for me I think.
  16. Wait. Are you saying the movie is trash or that he's trash for still going to seaworld?
  17. They paid a 3 million dollar fine. Once. For attempting to circumvent the cap.
  18. They made sense already. I doubt the numbers would be the same though. I don't think every fan of a team watches games their teams aren't involved in. I would think it would be much more profitable for the league to have the Rangers in a cup final as opposed to the Devils. Last Devils series against LA was a pretty poor showing for tv viewers actually. http://www.sportsmed...from-last-year/ There is really no logical reason for the league to want the Devils in the finals. At best it's always a mediocre showing in the ratings. I wish I could find the viewership from the 94 series. IIRC the 94 series is the second most viewed series to last years finals. Furthest I can find is 95. Weird thing I see is finals with Detroit are often quite low. Not as low as with Jersey but still quite low in comparison to most teams.
  19. Are you implying that as many ranger fans would be watching the finals with the Devils playing instead of the Rangers?
×
×
  • Create New...