Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

L. Stanley

Members
  • Posts

    710
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by L. Stanley

  1. Kesler to detroit is interesting they have a lot of assets - 1st -sheahan -mantha -nyquist -Sproul -Dekeyser I'd go Kesler + Edler to Detroit or Carolina Detroit has all the assets and giving them detroit and Kesler makes them contenders again for sure - this puts them on par with Chicago when completely healthy Kesler + Edler+ 2nd+3rd for Franzen Mantha Sheahan Sproul
  2. MG has to focus on quality not quantity trade kesler and get back the single best asset possible, whichever team is offering you the single best asset, that is the trade you go with
  3. if it is Sutter, Pouliot, 1st, I would wait until the draft, at the draft other teams would prob be more interested which would drive the price up. Also, we will know who is picking and in what order, and we could package our first round pick to get a top asset. ex : Kesler + 1st for 2nd or 1st over all + a 2nd lesser asset it would be huge to get Reinhart or Ekblad
  4. Kesler Hansen Mallet Sauve Dubinsky Umberger Jenner Wenneberg we could always move Umberger for like a 2nd, 3rd or just keep him and see how he plays for us
  5. I believe that, but I would want bennett added to this and we could send them Hansen.
  6. they got lucky - they got first overall picks or high picks when there were generational franchise players available - crosby, malkin, tows, kane, keith, letang, etc... both teams sucked for a long time, both teams are great american hockey markets with rich histories that attract a lot of interest from players around the league. The only proven way to rebuild is to suck and get good draft picks when generational players are available. So mind as well trade keeler, edler and luongo, get a lot of picks and prospects and tank for conor mcdavid and maybe tyson benson
  7. it depends where the team is, if you were talking about the team we had in 2011 then yes, like if you were a contender and needed that last piece, that last gamebreaker then hell yeah, I mean I was hoping that we would have traded Hodgson in 2011 for a legit top 6 forward but instead we went bargain hunting, which I did not understand at all
  8. go read hockeysfuture on this guy - projects as a future top 4 puck moving D man and he is 5'11 so we are moving kesler for a guy who is at best a top 4 d man and a career 3C and a 30th overall pick??? Kesler is a gamebreaker, I rather we just go for the best single asset we can get - if this is what the offers are then I would go kesler for strome straight up, that is better than the garbage Pitts is offering also hard to imagine PHI wouldn't try hard to at least match the offer
  9. holy crappers, here we are talking about schenn+ and Gillis is trying to get Sutter and Pouliot and the 30th overall pick??? excuse me while puke in my mouth. If Gillis screws this up, I pray he gets canned immediately
  10. horvat will be the future shutdown guy, we need a guy like schenn Ideally we get Johansen but I doubt CBJ moves him I'd actually do Kesler, Edler, Jensen for Johansen and their first, rhycel (sp?)
  11. yeah I agree, I would do that, what is the cap space like for philly? Both GMs can be happy with that trade, PHI gives up youth, but gets the best player in the deal and a top 2 D man, who will prob be their best d man
  12. with the way lack is playing, Luongo should be expendable this offseason, get lack a back up that can play like 30 -25 games, an experienced guy like JSG Luongo + our 1st four one of the top 2 picks in the draft - draft either ekblad or reinhart
  13. point being, if gillis goes for quantity like the Thornton trade or the Nash trade then we are screwed, look at stanley cup winnin teams, it is all about the best players being your best players and then your supporting cast steps up we do not need Sutter - we have Horvat, Gaunce, fox, cassels that may all end up being better than him
  14. if Pitts is where kes is going then it is gonna have to be: Maatta Sutter Bennett and one of Harrington or Pouliot still this package is inferior to what I think PHI, STL, NSH, NYI, NYR could offer
  15. kesler for morgan reinhart, 2nd, 3rd Edler and our 1st for 1st over all and draft sam reinhart
  16. whats all the discussion about ? it is very simple this team is not a contender, we have some players (Kes, elder) who are getting older but could still get us good young players not moving them at their peak value/possible peak value would be a colossal mistake for this franchise in 2 years if we hang on to kes and edler we will be worse off than is we traded them each for 1 real good asset that our franchise can hang their hat on going forward
×
×
  • Create New...