Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

PunjabiCanucks

Members
  • Posts

    1,038
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

20,505 profile views

PunjabiCanucks's Achievements

Canucks Prospect

Canucks Prospect (5/14)

859

Reputation

Single Status Update

See all updates by PunjabiCanucks

  1. Assume the Canucks had 1OA and it was a player of Hughes stature but not Hughes (removing the brother bias).... Would you be willing to trade down to #2 or #3 for additional assets?

     

    No matter at 1, 2, or 3, you are guaranteed a top centre, top winger, top 2 Dman

    1. JM_

      JM_

      If we were stacked with elite at C already, sure why not? 

    2. King Heffy

      King Heffy

      Depends on how big the drop in talent was.  I'd be a lot more willing to drop to 2 as opposed to 3 as I think Kakko has a good chance of being a better player in the NHL.  Price would be the next year's 1st or equivalent.

       

      Keep in mind I am very, very high on Woo and OJ.

    3. goalie13

      goalie13

      I don't think there's enough difference between Hughes and Kakko that the Rangers would be willing to trade anything to move up one spot.  There's a little bit of a gap to the third pick, but I think Chicago will be content to stay where they are.

       

      So I am not saying that I wouldn't be willing to trade down, but more that I can't see either the Rangers or the Blackhawks offering anything to trade up.

×
×
  • Create New...