Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Enter Search Term. Use arrows to navigate between autocomplete results. If no results appear, use Enter to do a full site search.
Forum Closure ×
Canucks Community
Forum Closure

PunjabiCanucks

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,038

  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

21,573 profile views

PunjabiCanucks's Achievements

Canucks Prospect

Canucks Prospect (5/14)

859

Reputation

Single Status Update

See all updates by PunjabiCanucks

  1. PunjabiCanucks

    No offense to Lind- but we should protect someone better. Do a trade where Lind is traded for a young better player another team may lose.

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. PunjabiCanucks

      PunjabiCanucks

      Incase they have 2 assets - rather then lose one of the 2- they can get a rookie back that Seattle may not care 

    3. Alflives

      Alflives

      I’m not getting it. :picard:

      Wouldn’t that team lose the guy they trade to us (who is better than Lind) and then lose Lind in the ED?  They lose two players that way, no?  

    4. kanucks25

      kanucks25

      Trading Lind wouldn't really do anything. We'd be better off trading a different asset (like a pick) for a better player and just letting Seattle take him.

×
×
  • Create New...