Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Enter Search Term. Use arrows to navigate between autocomplete results. If no results appear, use Enter to do a full site search.
Forum Closure ×
Canucks Community
Forum Closure

PunjabiCanucks

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,038

  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

21,566 profile views

PunjabiCanucks's Achievements

Canucks Prospect

Canucks Prospect (5/14)

859

Reputation

Single Status Update

See all updates by PunjabiCanucks

  1. PunjabiCanucks

    What is your starting day line up? Do we break the lotto line?

     

    Hoglander Petey Boeser

    Pearson Horvat Podkolzin

    Gadjovich Miller Garland

    Highmore Dickinson Lockwood/Chiasson

     

    Assuming Motte and Sutter are out for opening day.

     

    3 lines that can score- Gadjovich being the odd one out that doesnt belong in top 9 imo

    ----

     

     

    Or do we :

     

    Miller Petey Boeser

    Hoglander Horvat Garland

    Pearson Dickinson Podkolzin

    Highmore Petan/ MacEwan Lockwood/ Chiasson

     

    Motte and Sutter sub in when ready

    1. Patel Bure

      Patel Bure

      For me personally, I go,

       

      Hoglander-Horvat-Boeser

      Miller-Pettersson-Podkolzin

      Pearson-Dickinson-Garland

      Gadjovich-Highmore-Chiasson

       

      Lockwood

       

      OEL-Poolman

      Hughes-Hamonic (or trade for Mark Psysk)

      Juolevi-Myers

       

      Hunt


      Demko

      Halak

       

       

      I think Green will do this however:

       

      Hoglander-Pettersson-Boeser

      Podkolzin-Miller-Garland

      Pearson-Horvat-Dickinson

      Gadjovich-Highmore-Chiasson

       

      Lockwood

       

      OEL-Poolman

      Hughes-Hamonic

      Rathbone-Myers

       

      Hunt

       

      Demko
      Halak

       

      1) I’ve never been a huge fan of the lotto line as I think the combination of Pettersson and Boeser is too soft.  I think Boeser has better chemistry with Horvat.

       

      2) For me personally, I don’t think any of

      Pearson-Horvat-Dickinson or Pearson-Dickinson-Podkolzin will be able to generate enough offense.

       

      3) Although Rathbone is better overall than Juolevi right now, I think Juolevi fills the needs of this team a little better right now.  Juolevi brings a bit more defensively than Rathbone in my opinion.  I would rather see Rathbone go to Abottsford, log huge minutes, and then play on the 2nd pairing during calls up to Vancouver just incase one of Hughes or OEL are out with injuries.

       

       

×
×
  • Create New...