bp79
Members-
Posts
1,461 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Everything posted by bp79
-
At the srart of the year most peiple said the twins were waahed up. Than they get 7 minsbA game, they put up low numbers yet never complained. Now their getting 12-14 mins there Almost A point per game player lately. So to all that wanted then gone and if the rooks push for A job Burm will be gone, maybe we can unload maybe gags as well. Right now they have to be the besy 4th line in the league
-
I don't ever see him in the AHL. I would assume the Nucks have him on A. Schedule to gain weight. Cheers.
-
I never did what he said but it doesn't matter. I made A comment how they are both underperforming and A few decided to go into my account and downvote every post that was still in my profile. Fwiw. I pointed out there correct stats at the time. I still think 5 points in 40 combined games is worrisome. And too all those who downvoted me. All I did was point out the fact that we need some above average pmds. Sorry to anyone I insulted
-
You ask if. English is my second language? Well no it isn't but keep insulting me. Ive retracted. My retort
-
Well I can't message you as I waa told to block you and if I got another post b4 I could do that the mld will see it and ot sounds lile im just one of many who habe issueas with you Oh and I was rifght you were wrong I. Never gave tbe wrong total for anything. Went back and checked. All that crap you spewed. Amd when I give downvotes. It is usually because ao.eome has said somthing crass. Yoi I did it because ypu are an A (thing in the middle of A Dohnut
-
I still thibk you have me mixed up with someone else. I am sorry for any immature comments. And the I think Butcher will end up better than both. But I hope stech and Hutt prove me wrong. Cheers and I hope you have a great week.
-
GCG ..
-
Sorry for calling you A douche. I Still can't believe the hate I got for pointing out ud rather have Butcher then Hutton and Steches 5 points in 40 games. He looks like A stud. And may surpass both their totals this year. I do hope they turn it around. Cheers
-
Sorry my pm isn't workimg Sorry did't mean to vet off topic. As for 40 I like it
-
Previous poster was right wrong thread for this. I hope you are rigjt. We need tje offense from them
-
I Hope petterson becomes the best player in the draft. We deserve A win
-
I hope people are right about them. Otherwise our D is in trouble Cheers
-
You lost me at stecher. We need to face facts he isn't very godd just like Hutton. 2 points between our offensive dynamos. OJ I think will be A 40 point guy. But aftwr that our young D besides DP suck. And im A homer lol. I hope nxt year there both out of our top 6. I Also hope we trade guds for A puck moving D. Especually since Florida want's him so bad Anyone know who they have whovwould be A fit here? Goung forward id like to keep Tan Eds Zotto and pools. Cheers And love your positive attitude. Have A Nice dry day
-
You say he has mastered the end the rink. You say he is calm and composed and dumps the puck rather then making A high risk play. All the things you mentioned are what players with high IQ do. As for OJ I think you are right about him having a high IQ. Cheers
-
The Rebuild Kicked Off With Acquiring Bo, & Was Completed at 2019 Draft!
bp79 replied to Nuxfanabroad's topic in Canucks Talk
Thats all he does. Biggest douche. -
All i am saying is preseason and those 8 games he played he didnt look as good as he did as A rookie. Point i was making was im not sold on him being our right side offensive D. Not knocking stech he is A servable 6th guy. I just don't see him becoming an offensive juggernaught. You can put me down if you wan't doesn't change the fact that even in A small sample size I still think he looked lost out there. My point was I just don't think he is a long term solution. We need A true O defenseman on the right side. Instead of just acting like A kid why not show me why im wrong. Unlike you im open and hoping im wrong. Just not impressed with what I have seen since pre season.
-
Once Tanev and stech come back I hope they keep pouliot in the lineup. Hutton has regressed offensively I think him and Stech both have. Pouliot has earned a spot once were healthy at the cost of huttons spot. Stech is another guy. If he isnt putting up points then he should be sat. Jb needs to pull off A deal to get us A right shot offensive D if were looking like a contender at the TDL. If not I hope we target one in the draft or through a trade in the summer. Either way one who can step in next year and make A difference.
-
I think were seeing more of what he brings. He has played well for the most part, his defensive game has been good. Nice to see the points starting to come.
-
They're actually worse then the fans of other rivals are. It makes no sense how you can be A fan yet crap on everything Vancouver. JB might as well be Bettman for the hate he gets on our site at HF
-
He plays better with better players. Seems to bring it up A notch
-
Night and day the res[ponses on here compared to the canucks forum on HF. Are they even fans or just trolls? He had better stats overall this year while playing A more than a defensive role. This preseason wasn't his best. I think plays better under pressure. He knew he wasn't going to make the Canucks. Maybe took A few games to get over it. Still gonna be A stud.
-
If he earns A spot. I hope JB sticks to his word and makes room. Personally, I think JB is waiting to see how he does in the 9 games. If he earns A spot I think he will make A deal involving Edler. Nobody will convince me that he won't waive. The guy is A class act and when it comes down to it very few refuse A trade in the end. Especially when JB seems to go out of his way to send players to markets the players find appealing. Not some hole in the ground like Calgary or Edmonton. Put burr close to home Hanson in Cali. Dido with Bieksa. All guys CDC said would never waive. Oh and Garrison to tax-free Tampa JB is all class when it comes to dealing with his players.
-
I could be way off base, but I think the Canucks will be A bubble team next year as long as marky plays the way he has shown during stints as A Starter. You look at our division. Calgary is banking on Mike Smith as there big upgrade. The Oilers live and die by McDavid and Talbot. If one of them get hurt for a bit they are in trouble. They were already weak on d now have no sekera. The ducks will start the first 6 months without Vats Lindholm and Kesler. A team that has most of their core over 30 and Gibson who hasn't proven anything And as much as I love RN even Benning who loves him refused to give him A 2-year deal.Sharks are older and worse than last year. LV and the coyotes will suck no debating that. MY favourite thing about Chykos Pardon the spelling. iS he is proving scouting based on analytics especially in JR doesn't work. Oh, and the kings are old slow and will fight for A wild card any injuries they're done. Meanwhile based on his trends L.E always seems to take A year to adapt to a new team. Compounding the fact he was given like A month with the twins and them dumped off to the 3rd line. Canucks have so far on paper created A much better team, one with depth. Alwhile keeping to their promise if A young guy outplays an old guy he will get the spot. At least this camp will actually feel like one compared to the last 2 where most of the extra bodies seemed to be fodder. Quickly back to LE Sure, he struggled to score goals. but here is an article showing why he is important. I didn't find the article just copied and pasted from someone who did the leg work. Reminds me of Highschool minus the copy and paste we had typewriters hahahah This article explains things well regarding Loui: "Defensively, Eriksson’s played as advertised. The Canucks control the second-best rate of shot attempts with him on the ice as opposed to any other regular member of the lineup. Eriksson also has the second best impact on his linemates ability to control shot attempts at even strength. On average, Eriksson’s linemates are better off for having him along for the ride. He’s consistently done the legwork to create an environment for sustainable offence at even strength. You’d want that to flesh itself out by way of goals and assists, but hockey is a fickle sport. Sometimes you get the bounces, as Eriksson did when he put together a 30 goal season last year with the Boston Bruins, and other times, the only luck one can find is bad luck, and Eriksson’s used about six year’s worth and his first campaign isn’t even at a close. Among players with 500 or more minutes at even strength, only 68 players have a lower personal shooting percentage. His on-ice shooting percentage isn’t much better, and other contextual nuggets include playing with the fifth-lowest quality of teammate by expected goals percentage among any Canucks skaters. All this is to say that Eriksson is owed a better fate than the one he’s suffered. He’s playing tough minutes and doing everything in his power to put the team in a position to leave with their heads above water. That doesn’t make the Canucks any better this season (or worse, depending on how nihilistic your brand of fandom) but it bodes well for Eriksson going into, at least, year two. Eriksson is in no way a bad player or one who’s even performing poorly. In fact, if you look at Expected Plus-Minus, he’s the Canucks best forward."
-
God, I hope he comes out on fire offensively to start the season. He played great away from the puck but 6 mill means he needs to be scoring as well. Looking back at his career for whatever reason, he seems to always have a hard time adjusting to new teams and systems I think A 3rd line of him Rodin and Gags could be quite interesting. I just wonder based on Benning's proclamation. Where he said if the young guys earn it we will trade our vets. So If Brock Goldy and jake make the team Brock with BO Goldy with the twins and Jake with Bernie Gaunce on the 4th line. Dorsett as the 13th where does that leave Sutter? Im, not A hater of him quite the opposite just don't see where he would fit.
-
so if we sign him to an elc like St Louis did to Kostin he can still play in the SHL if he doesn't seem ready for at least the AHL this year. And that wouldn't burn A year of his coElc? or do we wait on signing him until after camp and see where the best fit is? if signing him now burns A year. I always thought as long as he doesn't play in Na this year even if we signed him. If he goes back to Sweden then it wouldn't count against the 3 years. But if we do sign him now then would we be loaning him to his Sweden club even tho he is under contract there? Sorry for all the questions but you seem to know how these things work. Cheers.