-
Posts
1,504 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Everything posted by John McClane
-
Thanks Alflives, this post took a depressing announcement and made me laugh. Cheers!
-
3rd string.
-
Hatcher is a beast.
-
Line has got to be better. But at least VA was able to put a drive together and get some points.
-
Offence looks like they have mailed this 1 in already. Somebody better be ripping them a new 1 on the sidelines right now. Don’t hang this Awesome BC defence out to dry.
-
Looks like the Lions left their focus in the locker room.
-
The Wayne Gretzky Discussion Thread
John McClane replied to Elias Pettersson's topic in General Hockey Discussion
-
The o-line has looked poor the last couple games. So far they are looking much better. Still not as good as the beginning of the year, but better.
-
Seen a lot of interviews with the Canadian players going into this tournament. Many of them making comments of feeling slighted and disrespected. Hopefully they can bring their anger and frustration to the field in the form of extreme focus. They are missing some key pieces, but I believe they still have a very good chance to make the finals.
-
[Official] Canada's Men National Football Team (Soccer)
John McClane replied to DefCon1's topic in Off-Topic General
Thanks. Awesome. -
[Official] Canada's Men National Football Team (Soccer)
John McClane replied to DefCon1's topic in Off-Topic General
I’m no good at setting up New Treads. But I believe the Women deserve their own World Cup thread. Go Canada. -
[Signing] Canucks sign Carson Soucy
John McClane replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
I’d be fine with a 1 year show me deal. Plus could be a solid deadline chip to play. Grab an extra pick or 2 if someone at the farm has earned the promotion. -
[Signing] Canucks sign Teddy Blueger
John McClane replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
Just as long as he doesn’t haunt our dreams. -
[Signing] Panthers sign Oliver Ekman-Larsson
John McClane replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
Seem like about 1 mil too much. -
I wish Conner had added a little green with that suit just to put it to Chicago a little bit.
-
[Buyout] Oliver Ekman-Larsson
John McClane replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
I really liked the way he played this year. Short period of time, of course. But he looked like he belonged in the NHL. -
[Buyout] Oliver Ekman-Larsson
John McClane replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
I’m sure some teams the Canucks were trying to do trades with, were strong arming the Canucks and holding there lack of cap space as hostage over the Canucks, and there by lowballing the return. This move should strengthen the Canucks position in trades now that teams have 1 less bullet in the chamber. This could be the biggest positive to come from the buyout. I just hope the future Cap increase projections work out. Then this move might work out. Here’s to the uncertain future. -
I did give you that. Not because I disagree with the opinion you gave. But because you missed the point of the post. I was merely posting an exercise to gage how much people on here valued the #11 pick. Im not sure how the post was miss understood or misleading. I did Not ask, would the Canucks do this trade? I did Not ask if Nashville would do this trade? Nashville was the only team I noticed that had 2 first round picks after #11. I guess I should have gone with Team X instead of using Nashville. Hopefully if I decided to make another similar post in the future I can fix my mistakes, and make thinks more simple. I really didn’t expect to cause this level of misunderstanding. I do agree with you that if this was an actual trade proposal, it is probably a little rich. For me, I value the #11 pick as pretty flexible. If a player that I could only dream of falling out of the top 10 actually fell to #11, it would be so hard for me to try to decide pick it or trade it. If an offer like 2 later first for #11 got offered. The Canucks could really use more picks, but this player was not expected to be available. What if the player that falls was the consensus #6 pick? On your top 10 list, you have this player ranked #6 as well. But team X had him valued at the #5 overall pick. I think it’s possible a team could make a strong move, if the value was high enough for them.
-
If 1 of the top 10 players drops to #11. The Canucks phone rings, Nashville is calling. They offer the Canucks there #15 and #24 for the Canucks #11. who, on here says YES? and who on here, drools over the player that dropped, says NO! and makes the pick? For me, it would definitely depend on which player fell. But I do have to say, that dropping a few spots, and getting a second 1st rounder would be very very tempting.
-
Lol. He wasn’t when he was in goal, lol.
-
[PGT] Vancouver Canucks at Arizona Coyotes | Apr. 13, 2023
John McClane replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Canucks Talk
1st time running the simulator, after the Canucks landed in 11th. Maybe it’s lucky number 11??? If only it could really happen.