Hansman

Members
  • Content Count

    202
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hansman

  1. Imagine how many more medals Bruce Jenner would have won, damn, Mr Jenner, could have been the most decorated women athlete in history, if it wasn't for that nagging penis between her legs.
  2. did you all know you can save on insurance as well as become top end athletes if only you tuck your parts, put on a dress and have a great imagination. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/change-gender-identification-insurance-alberta-1.4754416
  3. I might pretend to be a poodle and see if I can't hold my own in a dog agility competition, I mean they are fast, but I may be less distractible. Is there big money in the dog agility circuit these days?
  4. Why bother even keeping score? just let everyone win
  5. and everyone gets a first place ribbon and no scores are kept, no fragile feelings get hurt. But seriously I agree with you
  6. I have no problem with people pretending what ever they want, but are the trans people (dudes) dominating women sports kind of taking away from real female athletes? And would that not set back women sport in general if you just let men in skirts go win the sport? Besides if they just gave every one a medal or trophy everybody would be included, YAY 2019!!
  7. San Jose seems to be getting help again, kinda like game seven against Vegas, what a joke
  8. Silly question do you decide to trust one mans word only when it backs up your narrative? because one man says he through it, but we all know that doesn't fit the narrative right? You say you believe facts, after telling me Khadr never admitted it, now you say he did but he's lying, your just pick which statements you like and run with them
  9. OK pal when I was questioned over actions that myself and section went through in Afghanistan, while serving in the CAF never once did I bend from the truth even if it meant being jailed, which it didn't because we did everything according to ROE's, so I say again I would sacrifice my life for anything I believe in. one of us is a keyboard warrior, and one of us is a real one, you decide
  10. That does seem to be what you do I posted an article of him apologizing to the Speer family, and where it states to him admitting to throwing the grenade, but what do you do completely ignore it. I personally don't believe every article I read and I question most everything in life. We are obviously not going to agree on this, because you've made up your mind and that's fine.
  11. Be as skeptical as you would like, I stand by my claim. No I would not admit to killing someone I didn't,
  12. Well I guess that could be the case... however I would never admit to killing someone I did not kill for any reason, but it is what it is.
  13. 445 people are talking about this That is incorrect according to testimony from the American soldiers who were there. "I just remember being dumbstruck that there was someone being alive in there," a Delta Force soldier told the Toronto Star during an interview for the CBC documentary Guantanamo's Child. "After all that bombing, after all the ordinance we dropped in there, somebody was still alive." As the soldiers cleared the compound, their weapons were drawn. They did not expect any survivors. A Pentagon report written after the firefight interviewing the soldier who shot Khadr, identified only as OC-1, raises the possibility that someone else was alive in the compound when the grenade that ultimately killed Speer was thrown. "He heard moaning coming from the back of the compound. The dust rose up from the ground and began to clear. He then saw a man facing him lying on his right side," the report states. "The man had an AK-47 on the ground beside him and the man was moving. OC-1 fired one round striking the man in the head and the movement ceased. Dust was again stirred by this rifle shot. When the dust rose, he saw a second man sitting up facing away from him leaning against the brush. This man, later identified as Khadr, was moving . . . . OC-1 fired two rounds both of which struck Khadr in the back." Randy Watt, the commander who wrote that report after the action, later revised it to state that only one person was alive when the grenade was thrown. In an interview, he attributed the confusion to the "fog of battle." He changed the report, he said, because he thought Khadr had been killed due to the severity of his injuries. The report, and testimony from Watt and OC-1, would have been key evidence at Khadr's Guantanamo trial, which was halted when the Pentagon offered him a plea deal. A condition of the deal was that Khadr confess to killing Speer, which he did during an emotional 2010 hearing at Guantanamo where Speer's widow Tabitha was present. Once released, Khadr did not deny throwing the grenade as his lawyers have insisted. He said he simply does not know and hopes he didn't. https://www.nationalobserver.com/2017/07/07/opinion/what-if-omar-khadr-isnt-guilty https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/evidence-shows-khadr-couldn-t-have-thrown-grenade-in-firefight-lawyer-1.749998 https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/evidence-shows-khadr-couldn-t-have-thrown-grenade-in-firefight-lawyer-1.749998 https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/khadr-couldnt-have-thrown-grenade-that-killed-us-soldier-defence-lawyer/article20391135/ https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/omar-khadr-describes-firefight-that-killed-u-s-soldier-im-just-going-to-throw-this-grenade I don't know how many of those from however many sources one would have to post for that to be believable to a person with a serious bias on the issue but whatever. I have far better things to do with my time than educate people with simple facts when they refuse to read them. Biden though, no chance Trump beats him So I would definitely cherry pick quotes from an article, when there is a man that claims to have thrown the grenade that killed Christopher Speer, Ive been in a war zone....Yourself? or do rely on CBC to tell you all about it
  14. dude literally apologized for throwing the grenade that killed a medic from the US military, but he is innocent right? I'm done with this
  15. https://www.thespec.com/news-story/2175254-omar-khadr-apologizes-to-widow-of-dead-u-s-soldier/ Would you look at that I figured it out. He also admits near then end of the article to throwing the grenade! But CBC says no so they must be right
  16. my last question on Khadr, why when he testified did he apologize to Tabitha Speer saying "I'm really sorry for the pain I've caused you and your family" Quoted out of an article from the spec.com October 28 2010. I'm sorry I don't know how to add the link. Just curious how many innocent people would say this, help me out with this hippy, just cause you hold the terrorist to such high value doesn't me it's true or sane
  17. As with you my friend. But then again a hippy is always in the right
  18. Just for the record the arrogance on this thread is awesome, the I'm right attitude of so many who cannot seem to debate without saying catchphrases just great, and for the record this is still about Mr. Biden and if he has a hope in the election. I was asked my grievances on JT and supplied them and was told nope your wrong, great discussion well been fun, I am going to stay out of the political discussions. Just for the record I had a perfectly fine discussion with another poster whom obviously disagreed with my political standpoints and probably I his, but we managed to keep it civil. So good luck to you all and keep the amusement levels high
  19. Listen, I am not bigoted or racist or which ever catch phrase of the day you want to call me today, he was an admitted terrorist, meaning he admitted to doing it, you can defend this person as long as you wish, the fact that he left this country which was his country of residence, to go and aid in a fight against allied soldiers is grounds for treason charges. But you know CBC says that he is a changed man so the mighty Warhippy will parrot that sentiment.
  20. He seems to know everything about that case, I'm still unsure how a convicted terrorist, who killed one of our closest allies can then come back and sue, should he not be tried for high treason under the law?