Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

the harry

Members
  • Posts

    593
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by the harry

  1. About size: You don't have to be big, you have to play big.

    About playoffs: Size matters in playoffs, but first you have to qualify.

    About Suter: He brings good value for that price. You cannot pay all the players 5 millions or more when the cap is less than 90 millions.

     

    One of the biggest mistakes of Benning was that he gave to big contracts to bottom six forwards.

    • Like 1
    • Cheers 1
  2. 14 minutes ago, EdgarM said:

    I don't know if I am going for another championship and I have offensive weapons like Crosby, Malkin and Letang, is my priority to pay that much for another offensive weapon? 

    With a Cap system, you can only spend a certain amount on all your needs and going top heavy ala Toronto does not always become a recipe for success.

    If it was me, I would have looked for complimentary players to play with Crosby or Letang or Malkin or go after a shut down defenseman. 

    I suspect they will do fine in the regular season and even make it to the playoffs , but I don't see them doing much more then that TBH.

    Exactly. Penguins have a great team on paper, but most of the players have injury histories and I doubt they all will be healthy all year. I can see them missing the playoffs.

  3. 16 minutes ago, McBackup said:

    The flipside to the TO bump is that players get a massively inflated sense of their value due to the media being unable to remove their knobs from their mouths.

    I really think it would take 2 teams in Toronto, which could then have a healthy rivalry. I know no one outside of Toronto wants a second team there, but it would just make sense. New York has 3 teams, why not 2 in Toronto?

    • Vintage 1
  4. No doubt, Jersey needs that kind of player. But they may not need him. Everyone is replaceable.

     

    If Meier really insists on a maximum term with maximum money, I can see him being traded before June 30.

  5. On 6/10/2023 at 5:46 AM, Hairy Kneel said:

    What about making contracts more realistic? 4 years at market value for a top D, then add 4 years at a lower fee thus accounting for age? 

    4 x 8

    then 4 x 5.5

    Well, if you look at the numbers, that's the way it is. Frontloaded with bonus payments and 5.1 million in 2030 is, adjusted for inflation, at most half the current amount.

     

    Could contain: Page, Text

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...