Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Where'd Luongo?

Members
  • Posts

    2,862
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Where'd Luongo?

  1. That has nothing to do with anything at all. Feel free to look at stats and give me a real reason for any of your arguments. I owned you with real hard facts and you are now giving me articles from old men saying stats are evil, something every single sport has dis-proven.
  2. That wasn't my main argument, my main argument was what I have been talking about using advanced stats combined with conventional stats. That was a rebuttal of a very misleading statistic comparing 6 points to 22 points when one player played less than half a season and the other played a full season.
  3. ? which one's are being misused? offensive zone starts compared to scoring chances that show Schaller had more scoring chances against him than Gaunce did while also showing that it reflected the plus minus accordingly? Please enlighten me, how would you use those stats differently? Or are you an eye test guy?
  4. I'd love to see what Schaller's plus minus would have been if he played nhl at age 21.
  5. I'm giving you hard facts and stats, you are giving half facts leaving out very crucial information.
  6. 6 in 37 games vs 22 in 82 games. Also, Schaller was -5 on the season, so that's what really matters.
  7. Gaunce's FA% 41.65 compared to Schaller's FA% 38.4, meaning Gaunce actually generates more scoring chances and/or stops more opposing teams scoring chances (not including blocked shots) than Schaller, which is concerning considering that Schaller had 21% more ozone starts.
  8. Another talking point on Schaller vs Gaunce: Schaller Gaunce OZS% 36% 15% GA/60 2.05 1.74
  9. 6 points in 37 games, then injured. Also a 0 +/- on a terrible team.
  10. When in each year he has been better than the last, he is 24 and the average peak is 28, yes.
  11. Yes, Gaunce has potential.
  12. Dude, Gaunce played way better last year than the year before and then got INJURED FOR HALF THE SEASON.
  13. Chaput, Megna and Skille didn't have potential lol.
  14. Losing a guy with potential vs keeping a guy that won't play past next year but will be adequate for 1 year.
  15. Mainly because the young guy he takes it from might be lost to waivers or trade.
  16. If this was 2012 I might agree with you. This team needs points.
  17. Here's another point involving Gaunce as the guy he might take a spot from: Schaller at age 24 scored 18 points in 72 AHL games. Schaller is going to be 28 in November, he has peaked. Gaunce at age 22 scored 38 points in 46 AHL games. Gaunce is going to be 25 in March, he has not peaked. I would rather give Gaunce another kick at the can, especially considering he was injured for most of last year, rather than a 28 year old placeholder that doesn't have a future here.
  18. That's exactly what I want, the young guys.
  19. Hahaha you think we expect that? wow. We ask who is expected to replace the lost Sedin points?
  20. Here is what you're comparing and you think it's apples to apples. I apologize in advance I had to zoom out of Dan's to fit all of his stats in there since he has such a long NHL career.
  21. Exactly what I was thinking. We are hoping that EP can come in and get 82 points this season, and for Virt to score 25 goals. If not, it will be up to Schaller to boost those numbers from 11 goals to at least 30.
  22. Wow those players are so comparable, great work.
  23. The 25 teams ahead of the canucks disagree with you.
  24. What it means is that he played better than he is, and played himself out of the role because he will never live up to those expectations again and isn't worth that kind of money.
×
×
  • Create New...