RetroCanuck
-
Posts
2,902 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
1 Follower
Recent Profile Visitors
RetroCanuck's Achievements
Canucks Regular (7/14)
3k
Reputation
Single Status Update
See all updates by RetroCanuck
-
I wonder if we see Juolevi draw back into game action now that he doesn't have a chance of becoming Seattle expansion eligible.
- Show previous comments 9 more
-
rafferty was under contract during his college year in 2018/2019.
“Professional Games” includes the following: any NHL Games played, all minor league regular season and playoff games and any other professional games played, including but not limited to, games played in any European league or any other league outside North America, by a Player pursuant to his SPC
so minor league games counted too! according to the cba
i do not understand why teves would be considered eligible, because his contract was signed after the college year finished.
still there may be a source that you are referring to that goes against the CBA?
-
From your article: “Pursuant to his SPC” - standard player contract.
Rafferty did not have an NHL contract in college. College is not a pro league either but an amateur league.
Tryamkin is still Canuck property as RFA but is exempt because his years in the KHL don’t count as he is not under an SPC/NHL contract so only has 2 pro seasons.
Also “For the purpose of this section”. There are different definitions of age, pro years throughout the CBA. They are using the waiver definition of pro years for expansion.
Teves, Rafferty same situation as Fabbro. 1 game while Hughes as teenager needed 10 NHL games.
-
