Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

BigCountry18

Members
  • Posts

    166
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BigCountry18

  1. Eriksson is the only guy we should be looking at moving at this point. We need the depth from Sutter based on the durability of our bottom-6 centres. Baertschi was on pace for almost 50 points last season until the 2 freak injuries, none of which were his fault (puck breaking his jaw & blindside hit from behind). He's our most skilled player other than Petey, no way we should just trade him for an unknown, especially when we're finally trying to be competitive.

    • Cheers 1
    • Upvote 1
  2. You should consider the fact that Horvat played more defensive minutes and d-zone draws while still achieving top 6 production in points. Not to mention the intangibles. Also his progression trends up every season. I would value Horvat at 2 first round picks minimum with at least one of them being unprotected. And I still wouldn't make that trade unless one of them was the Jack Hughes pick.

    • Upvote 2
  3. Pearson now is worth a lot more than Gudbranson. But when we acquired him, he was a struggling forward playing 3rd to 4th line roles on a team that didn't fit his style of game. Just like Gudbranson was a struggling defenseman who couldn't catch our competition due to our new "run and gun" style of play.

     

    I'd say you could probably acquire a player of the same calibre as what Pearson is now for Hutton. So at best probably a gritty almost 20-goal scorer in their mid to late 20s. On the low end you're probably looking at a bottom-6 forward of similar age with 3rd line scoring potential.

     

    Let's just say we already have a lot of the forwards we would get for Hutton.

     

    Hutton for RHD makes the most sense if we're trading him.

    • Upvote 3
×
×
  • Create New...