Lewlowned
-
Posts
84 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Lewlowned
-
-
They're sitting at 23/23 on the roster, 45/50 roster spots, with a cap hit of $85,791,842. Next season's cap is $83.5M, so they're $2,291,842 over the cap.
Do they have any injuries for LTIR space? I can't seem to find any.
Maybe there's still a Granlund or Petry move in the works.
I'd take Petry at 50% retained from Pitt for that stud Future Considerations. A trade at 50% retained would be better than a buyout for Pitt, too.
A buyout is $3M, then $4M, and then two years of $1.25M. The trade would just be two years at $3.125M. That would put Canucks over the cap, but hopefully we're unloading one of Garland/Beauvillier.
Petry would be a good partner for Hughes. He can still play, he's just expensive.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Happy he got a contract. I like him
I don’t expect him to be a star, but injuries happen, and he adds some support at a much needed position.
He’s a solid boy and likes to throw his weight around. 43 hits in 12 games!
He can be a fine stop gap until we get Hughes a better partner
-
5
-
1
-
Reading this article on Pesce and I particularly like this quote:
"Pesce provides a very stabilizing element to that pair that allows Skjei to utilize his speed to jump up in the play and engage offensively."
Sounds like a perfect partner for Quinn.
-
1
-
-
Interesting. Why does Chicago give up a pick for Perry?
It’s not like his $1M cap is gonna help them to the floor all that much.
-
1 minute ago, Lonny_Bohonos_14 said:
Could be a decent 3rd line centre for the right price.
Positionally he might be fine at Centre, but he hasn’t taken many draws the last few seasons, and his win rate is atrocious. He’s got a lot of giveaways too, not many blocks, though he does PK.
I’d focus elsewhere, as I think we need a centre that can win draws. Ideally a righty.
-
1
-
1
-
-
8 minutes ago, coryberg said:
That's a lot of information for us to weigh out.
It’s all about whether or not he can scale up I guess…
-
9 hours ago, Citizen Erased said:
As long as he isn’t given Chaos Giraffe money.
I haven’t watched him a ton, but he seems much like Myers in his decision making.
Again, I haven’t watched him a ton, but people say he is physical. He has fewer hits/g than Myers, who I personally don’t consider someone who really lays the body often. Does he have a more physical presence beyond hits? He’s been in a few fights, but not a ton.
A bit slow to process and doesn’t move as fluid as I’d like. He also doesn’t have a ton of blocks, and his takeaways are poor. If we can get him for under $1M, it’s probably worth a flyer. Not sure I think there’s a ton there.
-
1 hour ago, -Vintage Canuck- said:
I'm hoping we take a look at Acciari. I think he'd be a perfect fit for our team.
-
1 hour ago, Kenny Powers said:
One of the best skaters in the draft, smart, committed to development…he was my first choice, and happy we got him.
Completely agree. His skating, his poise, his puck handling, and his intense work ethic were all major plusses. He's a good size and only going to get bigger.
I'm happy we drafted for a positional need. I think this kid will be an invaluable part of the organization.
Really looking forward to watching him develop
-
2
-
1
-
-
Does this mean Acciari isn't re-signing in TOR? I'd be interested in picking him up as a 3rd line centre.
Acciari is listed as a winger, but he won 337 FOs last year, 53.8%. He's only 5'10, but 209 lbs, and hit like a truck 244 times last season.
He PKs, and he could be incredibly affordable. He might be perfect to support some of our younger centres (Raty, Aman) through winning draws while letting the young guys play the centre position.
-
1
-
1
-
-
8 minutes ago, coryberg said:
Petry is owed a 3 mill SB on July 1st. Might have to wait for that to be paid first. Or maybe Pitts attaches the #14 pick and pays through the nose.
If this was on the table I'd take Petry in a heartbeat... only has 2 years left. And he can protect Hughes for those two years
-
1
-
-
Was probably never going to happen, but he would've been a great fit.
How's that AAV? Guy is pretty much a Defensive Specialist and solid centre. "Only" 51.5% FOW%, but he took over 1k draws, so that's pretty impressive.
But seems a little rich for a 4th line centre. Especially for TOR who is so cap strapped...
-
10 minutes ago, Kenny Powers said:
Looks interesting - prime aged, decent size. Scouting report calls him a ‘mid-tier defensemen’ (that’s a new one for me)
Why isn’t Chicago qualifying him?
I'm not sure honestly. He has 44 giveaways (Bear had 28 in 10 fewer games), and 17 minor penalties. So maybe they're looking for a bit more discipline?
Maybe they don't want to have nearly $11M tied up in Joneses and they're just happier letting some of their ELC LHD take that spot.
-
1
-
1
-
-
22 minutes ago, -Vintage Canuck- said:
Colton hits a lot and wins a good number of draws, though he didn't take a whole lot this offseason. Seems to have a decent O-Zone ability, great forechecking, and lots of shots.
I'm fine with Canucks missing on him, doesn't play much defense, and we need a shut down third line centre that PKs. Colton doesn't do that. And he's a left. He's not the 3rd line centre we need
-
1
-
-
Any chance Caleb Jones is worth a shot? Chi isn't qualifying him
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, Wilbur said:
Fine if they bring him in, but they MUST get rid of a winger (or 3) BEFORE they bring Woods in.
Yeah they gotta move some of these excess wingers out. Especially now that Pearson is potentially back
-
7 minutes ago, -Vintage Canuck- said:
I’m back and forth on Wood. He’s 27, so within our age needs, 6’2 190lbs, and he throws a lot of hits.
But I’ve heard he can make some smooth-brained decisions with the puck, leading to atrocious turnovers/giveaways. He also plays no PK time.
I’m interested in him as a potential 3rd/4th line winger, but I want to know if he is willing to step into a more defensive role. Shift away from the top-6 mindset and focus on being a menace to the other teams, while killing penalties. He could find a great fit in our lineup, if that’s the case
Potential 4th line that would be run and gun, that also kills lots of penalties:
Wood - Aman - Joshua -
12 minutes ago, D-Money said:
The flip side of this is, Edmonton probably expected more out of him against Vegas. But he was really ineffective that whole series. To the point where he was benched most of games 5 and 6. So I could see that leaving them questioning if he is worth committing to.
I didn’t watch much of that series so this is interesting to hear. We’ve obviously got a wealth of wingers and so I’m a bit hesitant to signing more without moving some of the older guard (especially with Pearson potentially returning).
This points to some thoughts I’ve had lately around the importance of embedding grit and toughness in the whole team. You can’t have one or two “tough” guys and expect them to carry the team through the playoffs. You need a culture of toughness built on trust and support. Players support each other and guys know their line mates have their back. For Edmonton, Kostin alone can’t watch everyone’s back, especially if he knows there’s not a couple guys behind him watching his back.
Vegas’ whole team is big and plays a solid game, lots of grit and snarl throughout their lineup. They don’t have one guy who has to do it all.
Team toughness is significantly more important than individual toughness.
So, all this to say, we need to build our teams camaraderie and sense of team, while also adding in some bigger knock-your-brains-out type players
-
24 minutes ago, mll said:
Jeez, still have to fill 6 roster spots with $4.5M…
LA must have some other trades coming up
-
1 minute ago, CRAZY_4_NAZZY said:
Kupari is the steal of that deal...he already at age 22 is a mature two way center, 50%+ in the faceoff dot, and has the speed and size to be a workhorse center.
Still untapped is his offensive skills, he is going to be a guy that contends for the selke in a few seasons. I really wanted him, he is ready to breakout.
Wow, he does have some great stats. Plays PK too.
RHC, 6'2, 200 lbs, 80 hits last season, 54.6% FOW.
Now how do we steal him from Peg?
Any way you could package our 11, Garland, maybe a prospect for their 18, Kupari, and one of their LD (Stanley, Dillon, Samberg) to play with Hronek?
I personally see so many valuable players available at 18
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
18 minutes ago, -Vintage Canuck- said:Oh, it happened.
What an absolute whirlwind of a thread lol
From being a massive multi-roster player trade,
to stalled out because a player wasn't waiving their NMC/NTC,
to a 2024 6th rd pick...
Gotta love the offseason drama!
-
6
-
I'd do that trade. I think there will be lots of strong options at 15OA.
With so many talented players in this top 20-25, if we can help the team by moving one of our excess wingers, acquiring a much needed RD that can play defense, clearing some cap space, and still pick one of our top guys I think we should absolutely do the trade.
I wonder if Nashville does this? What are they really getting out of this trade? Gaining some offense through Garland is valuable (NSH was 6th worst GF last season), but I think unless they have a specific player they want at 11, what's the value for NSH?
Getting Fabbro makes it easier to offload Myers to say, Chicago, without putting too much pressure on our young D prospects to perform.
-
1
-
-
23 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said:
I’d replace him with someone tougher, love Burroughs but he is and 8th dman at best.
For Defensemen, Burroughs is top 25 in hits this season with 165 (12th in hits/60 with 11.9), 84 blocks (35th in blocks/60), fourth in fights/60, and he's on the low side of xGA/60 at 2.52. Sure, his xGF/60 isn't great, but he doesn't need to be super effective in that regard to be a 6/7. (10 game minimum for all these stats)
Do I think he should be slotting in with Quinn? No.
Do I think he provides a ton of toughness and is relatively stable on the backend, if a little uninspiring? For sure. And to me that's worth a league minimum for a few years.
Plus he has huge character, is a local boy, and, as others have said, will stand up for anyone on the team. He plays clean, checks, and battles hard. I guess I just value what he brings. I also think tough guys like playing with other tough guys, spreads the workload rather than having a single "fighter"
So....
-
1
-
-
39 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said:
So not signing Burroughs means you can’t sign tougher players instead?
Obviously you can. I was saying that with my post. Sign more tough players. Don’t not sign tough players.
You say we’re soft as baby shit, so why get rid of one of our team’s only sources of fibre?
Just add some more oats and stiffen that baby up…
[Speculation] Canucks exploring Tyler Myers trade
in Trades, Rumours, Signings
Posted
Suter isn’t great on the draw, but he does have quite a bit of PK experience.
Zadina could be interesting, depending on the price could be worth a trial