Bad_BOI_pete
-
Posts
4,144 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Bad_BOI_pete
-
-
3 minutes ago, Bob.Loblaw said:
I think Bad_BOI_pete was just looking for an excuse to attack homosexuality, and with the Provorov thread locked (thanks in part to him), now he has a new hockey-related thing to rile everybody up about.
Go back to your own echo chamber and keep up the good fight somewhere else. Most of what you write is surprisingly incomprehensible. It's like if a TrumpChatGPT was writing your posts or something.
WOW!!!!!!
I think you are using this thread to Atack petey boi...
Petey boi welcomes all types of people in his life... I accept marriage of any two people without thought of Gender or identity... if you want to believe you have no gender i also support that... if you want to transition to a male or a female thats fine by me.... you can come into my house and i will cook you a meal and i will welcome you with arms wide open, i will not be afraid of you hitting on me or anything else... i have not ever had a sexual or romantic relationship with a man but have been open to the thought before but found i prefer woman...
I dont feel comfortable calling people with pronouns like car or grass or clown... i just cant do it...
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, The Arrogant Worms said:
How old are you? I was around in the 70's 80's and of course the 90's. Saying that we didn't understand why someone would be gay is wrong. Low IQ homophobes perhaps didn't understand. People hid the fact they were gay in the 70's for fear of getting the snot beat out of them by homophobic idiots. Things started to change more in the 80's. Lots of gay people at Uvic in the early 80's. We never gave a crap if you were gay or not. But then again University had a higher percentage of open minded young people. 90's was very accepting as I remember. Unfortunately some attudes are stuck and never evolved.
young kids popularized this term presumably the first that popularized it grew up in traditional and potentially even bigotted households... because any other use would not make any sense... this is the logical answer
when i said this i was specifically speaking about traditional conservative families and how they might be even preached about homosexuality in their own homes,churches etc... during these times... they would be taught about traditional ways of lives and how other views would be considered "wrong", "sinful" or "immoral" and some kid thought he was funny by calling something gay and some kids laughed and the other kids said it too because they also maybe thought a similar way or at least were too scared to challenge their peers who used it.
I know im right... there is no other logical answer to the popularization of it
-
1
-
-
OK folks that are upset... obviously we need a list of all the words we are not allowed to use anymore... no one wants to be cancelled because we dont know the rules....
what offends everyone so we san just get this over and done with?
i think a word that is offensive to me is cancer... when people use it to trivialize things that are very common and it just grinds my gears.... can we cancel this word?
I also hate the word patriarchal, Patriarch... the fact that men are being demonized for masculine behavior and also being scrutinized for also being too sensitive is confusing
I also want white to be banned too... too many people use it demonize people born with this color skin without their choice and its a very popular thing to do.... i want to be called translucent from now on...
only 8.1 billion more inputs and finally we can have our perfect society back...
obvious sarcasm but i am offended when i hear these terms used so loosely... but cancelling them
on a side note... i would gladly agree with many people here in saying that crawford is a angry man... and the way he acted out in anger was in poor choice and if he were to be punished or at least made take some anger management courses and therapy i would welcome and support this outcome...
-
1
-
1
-
-
17 minutes ago, 24K PureCool said:
lol, so sensitive those swiss.
I don't even relate that word to homosexuality. I relate it more to those that are in someone's pocket just like a** licker.
i know right... the term ****sucker has so many different meanings and IMO is not used as a homophobic slur.. in my experiences when someone uses a slur they use different words... and commonly in trades homophobic slurs dont even happen... i have heard bigotry in trades and its very suggestive stuff...
if crawford did this on a job site alot of people would be offended by his actions, not because of the words but how angry he got. he would probably be made fun of for stuttering, that maybe he had some anger issues and would have a rough lunch break... where he would either defend himself and be pushed harder back or laugh it off and then it would be forgotten
-
Just now, Dazzle said:
What a silly idea. Of course you have the freedom to say or do whatever you want. That does not mean there is a freedom from consequences.
Your right no one did! anything else?
-
11 minutes ago, BlakeQuinnAndEggs said:
Lmao are u kidding me? Thats not even a homophobic slur, have you ever worked on a construction site ?
Hell .. in Portugal and Brazil one of the most common ways to greet a friend is saying Eh caralho which literally is a slang term for hey cock sucker
This world is so incredibly soft. And it needs thicker skin
the fact that many have not experienced a very real form male friendship is very evident here... Throwing insults at each other and not being offended and throwing one back is a test in almost any trade... if you fail the test the insults will become more and more severe until you quit or you lighten up... they arent actually insulting you, they dont mean those words it is a test to see how well you can perform without losing your cool... losing your cool leads to incidents injuries and fights... FACTS
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Dazzle said:
Well, if we are going to generalize, a lot of people on the right say there is fascism and a violation of the freedom of speech. What do you say about that?
well if you want to discuss that we i will gladly take it up with you in private or if you prefer you can create a thread that asks for this discussion...
but to briefly discuss it it i will say this...
banning words that may or may not offend people depending on how liberal or conservative you are... and then acting out with shame hate and violence towards the use of some words could be considered as fascist... but im not accusing anyone here of fascism... but they exist on both sides of the spectrum
I will fight for the word ****sucker and anyone that tries to stop me is violating my freedom to use it ... I often use it when i make a "screwup"
-
1
-
1
-
-
Just now, Dazzle said:
Why does it have to be about political left or right? It's not about that at all. Furthermore, by summarizing people in spectrums, you run into situations where people on the left could very much agree with you, but you'll assume they'll hold the same notions because YOU put them there.
becuase their is no happy medium Dazzle... i could offend someone for using the word "woke: or "pc" or "SJW"
the fact that you are getting upset kinda proves how ridiculous this is... PC thinking is widely accepted as left leaning.. if your upset with that fine... if others are upset with that fine...
the fact is i cannot explain my point without offending someone is the issue here
-
1
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, Wolfgang Durst said:
imagine you are a ref and you are called cocksucker. You would consider this as a compliment, surely. Great. I think you ethic values need to change.
what a ridiculous response...
words have different meanings you know right? especially this particular one...
he was not complimenting the ref... but he was also not throwing homophobic slurs
-
1
-
-
11 minutes ago, Bob.Loblaw said:
Words come and go from society, and have probably done so since the dawn of man. The only older folk I've heard still using slurs are the immature ones who do it out of spite.
Now as for Crow, I'll give him a tiny benefit of the doubt. I'm sure he didn't mean to get into trouble, since he's been under the microscope since the Blackhawks scandal. Which is why it bothers me as to why you're so keen to defend his actions. This type of overtly anti-left rhetoric you've spewed out was exactly the reason you got other threads locked. This post of yours is a prime example of a bad-faith argument.
... its a truth that's argued by many people.. perhaps you are in a echo chamber... your views does not define how the fact that this PC culture of being offended by everything is getting less and less popular by the minute... just remember that for every action their is a reaction. you may not have just noticed yet but "woke" culture is dying.. every day that the claims get more and more ridiculous someone joins the anti "woke" culture...
And yes its ridiculous to call this man homophobic for using the term... we can all agree he has anger issues... but that's not what the story said it said he was a homophobe
and for the people you hang out with does it ever contain any laughter? wordplay and slight teasing whether its against oneself or others has always been a top echelon way of getting a laugh... if its immature to poke fun at someone i guess im guilty of being immature
and i will let you know i never have been warned for any of my messages regarding these so called topics you say i got shut down... maybe it was shutdown for other reasons?
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, King Heffy said:
He's definitely not the first coach to say something like that, but it's also exactly the kind of thing we want removed from the culture. I like Crow, but he needs to be held accountable if this is correct.
i wan to do a thought experiment with you...
the left argues that their is countless genders and anyone that feels they have been mislabeled by nature they can rebrand their gender...
they also argue that sexual organs do not define gender, that any gender can have one and/or multiple sexual organs...
if any gender can have a cock how can it be considered homophobic to call someone a ****sucker?
what is more likely and generally acknowlodged by the term with the world population that the natural male sex organ is dirty and gross.... and the reason we still use it a slur for a stupid person is because many think it would be gross and stupid to perform said act... hence why the term stupid, gross and idiot are often used before it to show emphasis...
like i said it hasnt been used as a homophobic slur for a long time... and in fact some small groups that include many different sexual orientations use it a term of endearment...
I have had people call me a ****sucker in a light spirited way along with laughter in response to a roast i have just given them.... and that in terms of cursewords this is a very tame one...
still I agree that crawford shouldnt have used the term in a work situation in a demeaning manner that he obviously intended... I just don't think it was homophobic at all...
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, King Heffy said:
And using the word "gay" as a synonym for "bad" used to be normal when I was growing up.
it used to mean happy or joyful in the 17 and 18th century.... by the 19th century it also became slang for a woman prostitute and a gay man was someone that had relations with these women. and if you said me and that lady were gay together you meant you had sex... around the 30's it started to also mean if you called a man gay it meant they had sex with not only prostitutes but also men... by 1955 it meant homosexual males and women prostitutes... by the 70's it no longer meant female prostitute and also included female homosexuals...
the fact that you use this as some kind of gotcha moment is funny... people in the 70's 80's or 90's didn't understand why someone would be gay... they thought how stupid it must be to grow up without ever bearing many many children... because success meant having a large family... of course people thought it was stupid at the time.... some people still have those conservative views today... that success is measured by how many children you can bring into this world... but much less people think that now and understand why someone would be gay... so it has naturally fallen out of favor...
the fact that anyone can be a ****sucker takes alot out of the merit that this is used as a word to slur in a homophobic manner.... many people will just curse and use that word in response to bad news... theyll just say ****sucker and regain their composure... in this fashion the intent is to show displeasure, and i don't know how you would construe this use with homophobia either.
The left needs to stop banning words... it doesn't work... new words will take its place...
-
1
-
-
The new PC way of complaining about a refs call...
Ref! I require a word! i must protest this call you made! Clearly from my eyes i could see that you made a mistake! Perhaps, you have outside motive's to skew the game results in your preferred outcome? Defend thine self!
-
2
-
1
-
-
The list i think has grown a little it...
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
This was not a homophobic slur, hasn't been for a while... if someones intent was to shame their sexual orientation they would be using other words...
The intent would be the same as calling someone a ***tard, c**t licker, Idiot, Wank**
he was calling him stupid... at least...
cant wait till the left to take away the words blowing and blew too....
George Carlin is stirring in his grave right now...
-
2
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
6 hours ago, Maniwaki Canuck said:
Just on the eye test, Beauvillier has been decent in his short time here, but not as dynamic as in his best days on the Island. Doesn't look quite as fast and doesn't hound the puck quite as hard. Still a useful player, but something happened along the way. Injury?
could also be confidence... or coaching... sometimes a coach can make you second guess yourself
-
3 hours ago, Toni Zamboni said:
gib tldr sers
ok i will give a TLDR
-
4 hours ago, Ghostsof1915 said:
It didn't mean to be cold. It's just to the point.
You: i didnt mean to be cold...
also you: comes into this thread to prove your dominance and ridicule science you do not believe in and the poster who spent their time working on this thread...
me: dont you have something more valuable to do then waste your time not reading a thread and posting your opinion about it? what did Analytics ever do to you that makes you so mad?
two players! Jani hakanpaa and Luke glendenning... two players i have spent maybe 20 minutes watching... two players that i found using analytics... two players i suggested we sign... two players that are playing way above their paygrade right now! was it a fluke?
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, AlwaysACanuckFan said:
Now this is funny!
Milllenials: hey i have been looking at this players anlaytics and......
Boomer: starts yelling at clouds... in my day.. hockey was a REAL sport....you knew where you stood by how many teeth you had in your head... Now that's advanced analytics you'll never find in a stat! Millennials, why dont you do something valuable with your time... like pretending you are a GM of a hockey team and propose those idea's online for people to discuss. the want, the need and how realistic the proposal... we like basing our opinion off 'REAL FACTS' like the 1 day in January when i watched that player for 22 minutes and i watched a whole game of his in October. and all the sportsnet highlights!!! i watch All of them... every one.. never miss it...
Now that's someone who is qualified to make their opinion.... stop assaulting my eyes with Stats i do not believe in! they are not wanted here you time wasting money wasting child...
Millenial: you clicked on a page that said analysis. and got upset when you saw stats?
Boomer: No! of course not! I clicked on the thread to just ridicule this person and his insane ways of viewing a a game that is impossible to derive information from stats like hockey! Stats do not belong! I still barely trust a hit stat hits today are weak compared to the perfect days of hockey and some of these hits shouldn't be counted!
Millenial: well the science says...
Boomer: I don't need science to know when when i see good hockey from these EYES!
Millenial: Ok.... analytics are not meant to replace hockey scouts, they are meant to help prove their analysis and help find players that may be under or out performing their peers...
Boomer.. Its EVIL VOODOO... and i dont want to see it!
Millenial: wee ackhsually science says......
Boomer: EVIL!!!!!
-
1
-
-
11 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said:
I appreciate the work involved with putting this together, but I'm old school and haven't gotten into corsi etc. Canucks seem to need a few upgrades, or even just switching certain players out to get a better mix of players.
the graphs are nice because if you watch the games you don't really need the charts unless you want to break down the stats to the extreme like i did here...
The gra[hs are a easy way to get a very good idea of how a player is performing with his linemates...
The charts are good because you can compare how each player plays with any other player on the team, it further breaks down quality of competition down to the line they play on 1st,2nd,3rd,4th.. with advanced stats you can use it to confirm what people are saying....with enough time spent i spent 5 hours.... you can come to very good conclusions.... but you need to take into account alot of metrics. you can then compare their Goal for%, shots taken, high danger chances taking into consideration ozone starts and line mates...
its not something you have to learn and test against your eyes... but once you got a good idea you can then start analyzing players without even watching them play... of course you will have to do a little research to fill in the gaps like how fast they are
-
9 minutes ago, hammertime said:
What is %Grit?
so grit is basically 4th line players... Middle is your top 9 and elite is 1st liners... i dont make the terms... some stat guy did...
-
1 minute ago, BCNate said:
Not sure what your graphs say, but I've been really happy with Beauvillier. He is a complimentary winger in a decent deal and has produced pretty well on EP's wing so far. I'd say he is our 2nd best winger after Kuz right now.
the chart says that too... EP and AB have been playing well
-
5 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said:
Huh?
my math
forward good + d bad + goalie bad + coach good = need d and goalie
well our 3rd and 4th lines with dries and aman are nor performing very well...
arguably only EP and Hughes are doing good
-
You really think we are going to get a RHD top4 tweener and 2 prospects drafted in the 1st and second rounds only a couple years ago?
(Discussion) an analysis of our new d pairings before and after Tocchet... plus how is AB doing...
in Canucks Talk
Posted
it was satirical... on the actual responses i received in this thread... someone called this evil voodoo and someone referred to me as a millenial... that over analyzes everything...
but im of the hard opinion that boomers are generation x.... thats the hard take.... im sorry that you dont accept the term...
Just taking the piss....
anyways it was really funny and kinda sad seeing a whole bunch of people getting offended over statistics... stomping around the thread putting in insight about a&b sound...
just another example of how silly some people are...