Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Bad_BOI_pete

Members
  • Posts

    4,144
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bad_BOI_pete

  1. at this point it's a shutdown line, consider him a improved LE
  2. yes it does. if you start the season using LTIR your max cap will be 81.5m + relief (say hawryluk) if you do not use the full relief you will start the season with a ACSL less than 81.5m what ever the difference is. the canucks did a really good job and our acsl is $81,490,212. anyways have a good day = = =
  3. you are just not getting it. their active roster+penalties is below 81.5m the other 18m is LTIR. everyone starts the season either under the salary cap. or under the offseason upper limit, which will be reduced to under 81.5 with LTIR I believe tampa circumvented the cap this season along with Chicago and maybe a few others. we will see if they are penalized. but every single game this year the active roster was below 81.5 million .
  4. your scenario said you wanted to trade beagle and roussel, i said that was interesting, because who wants them. you back tracked said beagle can go on ltir, which is fine. but roussel would have to be traded for a retained salary or maybe needed a 1st round pick thrown in. LTIR IS NOT A GOOD THING TO BE RELYING ON
  5. well, there active roster calculates to under 81.5m so i see they are not circumventing the cap. cap space is a weird thing everyone starts at 81.5 million at the beginning of the season, why toronto's is 84.5 is because of ryley nash's 3million. if they went above that during the season they would be fined hard.
  6. which means that if ferland and beagle are on LTIR we will have to be under 87.5 million before opening season. every dollar we are under we lose in available capspace until they are reactivated. Also rookies and over agers joining the team after opening night will have to calculate thier bonuses into thier cap hit. it's not a good thing to have players on LTIR
  7. incorrect, ferland salary is calculated before opening night.in fact his salary always counts against our cap, we simply gain a replacement. in your world having 20 players on LTIR worth 81.5 million means you can have 163 million dollars of players on the roster which is not true. go peruse capfriendly no ones active roster is over 81.5m
  8. or in other words, if we had 9 players with a total of 81.5 million on LTIR we would still only have 81.5 million available in replacements. once those players come off LTIR it's trade time because they will be over the cap
  9. in the pre-season I made a mess arguing about LTIR. A few experts explained it to me i think MLL was his name. if you want to understand it better go to capfriendly. just remember that the injured players salray doesn't disappear, it is replaced
  10. nah, i know better. don't you remember this preseason and hamonic?
  11. when you start the season, you have to be under the cap or put the players into ltir before the season starts. either way you do not gain a advantage, merely a replacement. in almost every situation you lose cap space, and you lose other benefits too. LTIR players on your roster is a bad thing, except when you can use it to circumvent the cap and bring those players back in the offseason.
  12. ferlands ltir does not gain us any cap space, you could argue beagle's might but not ferlands
  13. yes i could see that playing out. but those retained salaries add up, thats 3 million right there. we probably wont be able to do all that OP is suggesting
  14. that would be positive value, thats what i find interesting
  15. oh you think, virtanen beagle and roussel have positive value? interesting
  16. sure, if you want to sacrifice the future to go all in this year
  17. i understand the thinking, and i don't know much about gadjovich, but he would be the one i would let go. motte is a really good player we win more games when he is in the lineup
  18. motte is a much better player than either of lind or gadjovich, he's one of those players that you need on your team. he's kinda just started peaking and we should get several more good years out of him. i would be fine letting Gadjovic or lind go over motte. https://www.nhl.com/canucks/video/motte-buries-beagles-set-up/t-277437438/c-7332286 https://www.nhl.com/canucks/video/mottes-second-goal-of-game/t-277437438/c-7350812 https://www.nhl.com/canucks/video/motte-scores-33-seconds-later/t-277437438/c-7858601
  19. no, i saw all the rock stars when i was younger, dad used to yell at me when i slowed down to let them jay walk
  20. if there's something screwed up in the lower mainland, why is it always whalley?
  21. there could be a potential three way trade before draft day. canucks: OUT: miller and our first top 5 pick IN: two 1sts, two 2nds (2021) two 2nds and a third (2022) team A: OUT: a 1st(2021) 2nd(2021, 3rd2021) IN top 5 1st 2021 team B: OUT: 1st (top5)2021 2nd,2021,2nd 2022 IN: miller
  22. love this proposal Jan, Now is the time to pick up first rounders. imagine having 3 young stars entering the league in 2 years, it would really help our cap situation moving forward
  23. not resigning motte is a mistake, the reason he is injured all the time is because of how hard he plays, with a little coaching and a line promotion you could get a lot more games and minutes out of him.
  24. that money could come in handy, if i had a choice between investing 1m in a house and 2m in stocks or 3m in the vancouver real estate, i choose the former
  25. wow, look at how much hate hfboards has for mcdavid https://hfboards.mandatory.com/threads/100-points-in-53-games-for-connor-mcdavid.2822003/
×
×
  • Create New...