Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Gawdzukes

Members
  • Posts

    8,240
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Gawdzukes

  1. Yeah, basically it's like how life should work. When you're up (rich) in the series you can't cheat or take any shortcuts but those behind (poorer) you will be given a couple mulligans (hopefully within reason) to even the playing field. It's always been in the perception of how the ref views the story. In no way, shape, or form does a ref want to be accused of gifting a deciding game to any team. So they'll be tough on us for sure until the game takes on it's own identity. What you tell your team is play fast, skate, take short shifts and don't do anything even resembling a penalty, because it will be called for sure.
  2. Total reading comprehension fail. He completely explained that in length in the part you apparently got to tired to read.
  3. I hadn't thought of that. I think you're right. The refs are not going to let us get away with so much as a love slap and the Blues will have Carte Blanche to start the game.
  4. Nah, just the Canucks man. I think it would be useful for everyone calling out the refs to see all the calls lined up against each other and how petty they all are, on both sides. I bet you could find 100 penalties in that game yesterday but refs are like editors. They dictate the flow of the story and we write it. People have to understand the refs are just another part of the game and you're going to get a handful of seemingly random penalties to both teams most games, some good and some bad. It might be funny too, you could put a little giddy up jangly music in there for all the people falling down like an old old western or something. Anyways, thanks again keep up the good work.
  5. It looked fine to me. You don't have a camera inside the refs iris. He calls the play based on his eyes, not your video reply. Clearly, the refs, and the multitudes of Blues staffs, the Canucks and the Blues didn't think it was covered either. It doesn't seem like Binnington bats an eyelash. I had no clue why you keep blithering on with this non sense but I did glance at your ref comment, and yes if that's the point the refs are not screwing us over. That I understood from the get go.
  6. Nice work, do you think you could do one with all the penalties since the start of the playoffs, but just 3 second clips or whatever is necessary to see the infraction? Totally not insisting you do it as I assume it's a tonne of work, It would be really interesting though to see all the penalties both for and against lined up without the context just to see if it looks like we are getting screwed by the refs or not.
  7. I was going to say that to that @John.Tallhouse I think that Binnington gets the call too.
  8. Did you see Hrudey all drunk and red faced trying to pretend he was happy his old playoff shot record got shattered? What a goof. Whenever I want a good laugh or I'm feeling down I just db Hrudey stats
  9. lol, me too, I think his wildly changing viewpoints and random pot shots probably fit in better there
  10. I can't believe we traded Vanek for this plug. #firebenning
  11. I know, I'm not arguing with you really, the image of Leivo just popped in my head from your colorful explanation.
  12. Well call up Greener, you know better. I am at a loss as to how you can't pick that puck up with your eyes but carry on.
  13. You gotta learn hockey better. Clearly not a goal as any half seasoned hockey viewer can see. Also, the team was gassed without Edler or Myers to play those crucial moments.
×
×
  • Create New...