Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Kenny Blankenship

Members
  • Posts

    472
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Kenny Blankenship

  1. Agreed. He’s a phenomenal player to watch. The edge work and pure puck skills are outstanding
  2. Literally only Larsson makes sense for us, and as has been mentioned many times before, we didn’t even have an opportunity to sign him. Imagine we gave up an asset for his rights and he just ended up signing in Seattle anyways. It would be pandemonium on here. Some of y’all will never be happy.
  3. I’m happy they picked Lind over Gadjovich. The style of player he has the potential to become is far more valuable to our lineup than Lind would be. Sucks to lose him but every team has to lose someone.
  4. I’m at a nice little pub on the island, crushed a couple Kilkennys
  5. I honestly just don’t understand it though. Everything that’s reported by local media always ends up having some form of negative spin on it. What’s the point in wasting your time and energy on being so negative. I’m just sick of every bit of news coming out a Vancouver is just useless conjecture. Damn, I need a beer lol.
  6. What’s the deal with the paranoia within this fanbase? Why is the sky always falling?
  7. People are seriously overhyping Lind and Gadjovich. Yea they are nice pieces, but by no means would we be losing a sure fire NHL level talent. We should be thankful that our options are for the most part low value.
  8. It’s so redundant to give up pieces to get Leddy when we already have Schmidt. I’m not gonna reply after this because you are literally trippin’ my man hahahaha.
  9. Okay let’s say, hypothetically, we pick one of those guys up. Who gets exposed on D then? Do we lose OJ as a result? So you wanna pay a second for an dman and in the process lose a dman. So instead of losing 1 good prospect, we lose 2, and a pick. What a head scratcher that would be.
  10. Oh god, just give it a rest already. We got excellent value out of a 3rd rounder, why can’t you dorks just leave it at that.
  11. With that selection they might just end up picking a name out of a hat
  12. The reality is that we are going to lose somebody, and we’re lucky that we won’t be losing any significant value.
  13. I think Alf needs some scotch, seems to help him think more clearly.
  14. No, we need a team of strictly offensive studs. Having a well rounded team is overrated, just ask the godly Laffs.
  15. All right it’s decided, the all-wise Convincing John has spoken. We clearly lost this trade.
  16. Sorry but do you have any evidence of this? Or is it more made up nonsense? Maybe it’s possible that Jim and his team work together to come to decisions? If he didn’t want to pick Petey, he wouldn’t have.
  17. I remember watching him throughout the playoffs last year and just thought he was a solid hockey player. Can always use those.
  18. Every team is going to lose someone, Alf. We should consider ourselves lucky that we won’t have better talent exposed. We just got a big defense first center for fairly cheap. Too much value is being placed on a 3rd rounder.
×
×
  • Create New...