Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Mustard Tiger

Members
  • Posts

    4,953
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mustard Tiger

  1. Nice! Another move a team can make with lots of term and decent dollar that gets moved without question. But don't you pesky canucks fans think you can get out of cap and gain assets from it
  2. Fantilli it is! Bedard will come post ELC once he demands out of Ohio!
  3. Twitter is wild. So many canucks fans are trying to say they should have just put him on waivers. We seriously have the least educated fanbase lol. Dedicated but my goodness lol. CDC is a safe haven compared to that place
  4. Sign every middling talent guy in UFA and keep flipping them at the TDL for 3rd / 4ths ect. Easy profit
  5. We need replace his money with a more versatile player. PKing 3c but I have no idea who lol
  6. Just give us Bedard. Being a Vancouver fan is something else. How old is FA? Age catching up yet?
  7. We are going to give him a A+ on his jersey instead. Found common ground
  8. It's about your attitude towards assets. You pretend like they couldn't wheel and deal 3/4 of them to build around the 2 or 3 superstars they hope to hit on lol
  9. All I want to do is focus futures and bringing in as many positive assets as possible prior to ascending to a playoff team. The Canucks want to skip past that stage and invest into the main roster instead. I don't agree at all. However there is absolutely no point running it back with the same defense just add Hronek.. Nothing will improve till we have a stable top 4. UFA shopping is suspect as well as we all know lol IF we land livingstone and especially a 2nd NCAA guy I would strongly consider finding another top 4 D to play with Hronek using our 9th or so pick + obviously moving Garland or boesers contract finally off the damn books. I just don't see a point in having a top 10 pick, Followed by a bunch of late picks and pretending like we are focusing the system while also just running it back because we are unwilling to do what it takes to fix the defensive issues. Just commit to one direction as its short term pain HOPEFULLY long term gain regardless. And this is a interesting thread for this convo
  10. I meant at the draft. Say we fall back enough where the BPA is all Lekkerimaki like long term projects... In that case I think we would opt to move the pick
  11. True. All I know is we are falling back to 7-11 range. It's whatever I guess.. Makes me really think they will trade that pick with a winger with term and get a top 4 D in return ( as long as it's not a lottery win obviously )
  12. We can simply not agree with it but they are actually doing what they explained. Swapping out older guys for ready now players. I hate it too but we have no choice but to deal with it for 3 or 4 years till it either works or we get the big earthquake finally and won't have to worry about the Canucks anyways for years to come after that
  13. Dan's going to have to step up and play center at this point. Right handed as well
×
×
  • Create New...