ak96

No, we need to bring coercion back. Likely, half of people got the vaccine because they wanted to eat in at the restaurant, go to the gym and travel, but now they can do those things regardless of vaccine status. Those things are not rights, they are privileges. Therefore, the freedom argument is completely baseless when it's a life or death thing and when protecting the community. We probably need to promote a 4-6 month vaccine schedule to end covid for good. Setting up re-education camps and blocking access to grocery stores for those who choose not to be boosted or vaccinated will help with the booster campaign immensely. The virus is still raging because of the unboosted and unvaccinated.

Not sure how you would be against 3 shots per year. There is no harm, time to make it mandatory...science shouldn't be questioned

Exactly, thanks to the vaccines I am still healthy unlike the unboosted and unvaccinated aka the unintellegent fools. Side note: Why do we have to wait 6 months for a booster in BC when in Saskatchewan allows you to get one every 4 months. The booster starts to wane in 90 days so a mandatory booster shot at least every 4 months seems like the smart thing to do. 0 side effect from the vaccines vs being on a ventilator and taking a hospital bed away is the choice to make.

Wow, imagine being against seat belts and airbags for cars? Each dose represents a brake pad and the paxlovid represents the air bag. What is there to save the unvaccinated?

https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/pfizer-ceo-tests-positive-for-covid-19-has-mild-symptoms-1.6027736 This proves we need to be very careful and need our boosters. Despite his 4 doses of the vaccine he still needs the paxlovid treatment. Imagine if he was unvaccinated.

They were also stupid enough to think that we took the vaccine solely because we were told the vaccine stopped someone from contracting the virus (no politician or health official said that). We all know and were explicitly told that the vaccine was to limit the symptoms and protect the community (we are likely not to transmit the virus as much as the unvaxxed). In which the unvaxxed don't care about anyone else and they themselves are dying in droves. But who needs dumb convoy supporters who are also likely mysoginists and racists. Covid isn't finished with them. The data is clear 0.0174% of the unvaxxed currently is needing critical care. Just going to take some time to finish them off.

This is very compelling to take the vaccine and continue the boosters. When you convert it on a % basis it equals 0.0763% of unvaccinated need to be hospilized "with" covid Taking two shots further reduces the risk of hospilization to 0.0486% And if you do the right thing and protect your community to 2+ boosters it falls to 0.0403% The risk of critical care is 0.0174% for unvaccinated 0.0078% for double vaccinated and 0.0059% for 3+ doses. So taking at least one booster gives you a 0.0019% better chance to stay off a ventilator. Why wouldn't you help your odds and protect your community to save the vent to someone who actually needs it? There is no concrete proof of any vaccine adverse events. So that is 0.0000% with zero side effects so there should be no worries from the unvaxxed who question the science. Also, what is scarey is the Jaimito BC charts on display doesn't even include the unvaccinated deceased who died with covid. Since fully vaccinated, I've only contracted covid twice , the unvaccinated crowd must have passed it on much more. The quoted chart shows we need a harsh lockdown till everyone has at least 3 or 4 shots. Why do we tolerate those who have 2 shots or less? We can move the needle from .00174% needing critical care to .0059%.