Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Spoosh

Members
  • Posts

    3,154
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Spoosh

  1. Mathieu Garon? (That would really had hurt him if Smyth had hit him in the arm...)
  2. Hmmm... Garrison? Usually it's the forwards that should do it. And in that case they wouldn't lean on the D to make it happen. They'd change strategy a bit then. And in case of emergency, even Hamhuis and Ballard can do a few times it if they get top-pairing PP time and given the role to shoot a lot. It's not like our offensive production is up to our defenders to accomplish, they are just helping out. Secondary scoring if you will. Not buying it? Then don't.
  3. Yup! (didn't notice this one earlier, sorry)
  4. It's true that his good offensive stats were a part of his contract, but no GM is so simple minded that he ignores what he has when he signs a deal like that. We had one of the most offensively talented teams even before we signed him, top 5 in the league in most stats. Very offensive d-men before we added him. I don't think the management or coaching staff is unhappy with his offensive performance when so many others have gotten the job done. Bieksa 5 Edler 4 Garrison 2 Hammer 1 Tanev 1 That's pretty good production and offensive help. Probably more than the other teams have. Someone scores the goals. Garrison won't score the majority of them on a team like this. Then people would be upset with the Sedins, Burr, Kesler or someone else for not contributing... People are never happy with anything they have around here...
  5. Stalock then? I'm getting sloppy...
  6. Razor? Edit: Waaaay too late on this one And to a previous one, Whitmore was exactamundo.
×
×
  • Create New...