Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

HKSR

Members
  • Posts

    8,542
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by HKSR

  1. Why is it that whenever something is working well on the Canucks, it is overachieving? LMAO. That's such a weak way to simply dismiss what is actually happening. Motte was theoretically on pace for 20 last season.
  2. I also like to play SPROTS... but that looks fake to me.
  3. No, but the foundation to build a 4th line with guys under $1M each is there buddy
  4. I don't think it's all doom and gloom. There's still time, and there's still the offseason. At least we will get to see how good or bad this current team is for the rest of the season.
  5. Lamikko - 10 goals Highmore - 10 goals Motte - 10-15 goals That's pretty solid for a 3rd line. What are you expecting? 15-20 goals each?
  6. Why not bruh? He was on pace for nearly 20 goals last year, and on pace for 12 goals this year. I'd say Motte is good for 10 - 15 goals. Lamikko and Highmore are good for around 10 goals each. That's solid production from a 3rd line that brings energy and checking ability.
  7. That's why I said the Motto line needs to be our 3rd line, then build a 4th line around guys making $1M or less each. Assuming Motte is re-signed: Garland-Petey-Podz Miller-Bo-Boeser Highmore-Lamikko-Motte 4W-Richardson-4W Allows us to unload Pearson, Dickinson, and Hogs. There's enough cap savings here to add a $5M UFA RHD if we wanted to this offseason.
  8. Uhh... we added $1.5M + $800k for $2.3M, while subtracting Hamonic's $3M. So a major savings of $700k!
  9. I am, but I'm more curious how the lack of moves in general is affecting CDCers psyche today haha
  10. It'll just be interesting to hear people's reactions when we basically add Dermott and Richardson, and subtract Hamonic.
  11. I think he gets between $2M to 2.5M. Less than $6M on a 3rd line is fantastic bang for the buck. With a roster built like this, there would be $5M+ for a Top 4 RHD via UFA.
  12. So... you're saying they don't have enough... time?
  13. I think it makes sense to load up on the Top 6, and make the Motto line the 3rd line while using Richardson and scraps to fill out a 4th line. Allows us to dump Dickinson, Pearson, and probably Hogs Garland-Petey-Podz Miller-Bo-Boeser Highmore-Lamikko-Motte 4W-Richardson-4W Would save a lot of cap going down this path. Pearson has value and can be moved. Hogs could very well be a sweetener needed to move on from Dickinson. Lockwood gets his chance this way.
  14. Garland-Petey-Podkolzin Miller-Bo-Boeser Highmore-Lamikko-Motte 4W-Richardson-4W Goodbye Dickinson, Pearson, Hogs
  15. We just claimed Brad Richardson. I think Motto line is the new 3rd line. We're gonna build up a 4th line and truly stack the Top 6.
×
×
  • Create New...