Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

HKSR

Members
  • Posts

    8,542
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by HKSR

  1. Pretty much bang on for a RHD like that. I expect any top 4 RHD capable of 20min+ a night and a regular contributor to be about $4.5 to $5.5M AAV.
  2. Hey! When do I get a belt? I've taken a beating on this forum
  3. We are seriously lucky that Schenn has clicked so we'll with Hughes. It allows Hamonic to stabilize the 3rd pairing.
  4. Truth. Yet some people still think this team needs to dump Miller and Boeser.
  5. Anyways I'm done for tonight. I'll continue arguing tomorrow when I'm back in the office lol. Enjoy the game!
  6. 2 years we will be a contender... just like what JR has said.
  7. https://forum.canucks.com/topic/399917-no-core-player-needs-to-be-traded/
  8. Yes they will. I've already proven that with math in my other thread. We can keep Miller and Boeser and Bo and Petey and Hughes and Demko and be able to afford a $5m+ UFA defenceman if we can simply move Dickinson and Poolman.
  9. Your time horizon talks about the Canucks being contenders when Demko will be on a new contract. So you better be concerned about how much more he will make. If Petey isn't making close to $10m, then we will definitely have offensive problems.
  10. That's not what we need. The next 2 years alone there's guys like Manson, Mayfield, Cernak, Severson, Weegar, etc. I bet most of them will be signed for $5m AAV or less.
  11. If Petey plays to the potential you hope, he can easily goto arbitration and make $9m+. Demko will definitely be $9m to $10m.
  12. What is your time horizon? Petey is 3 years. Demko is 5.
  13. No I'm not. We aren't looking for a franchise defenceman. We need a steady top 4 RHD defensive defenceman. They are not that much more than top6 forwards. In fact, look back at free agency and its usually the top 6 forwards that cost a fortune.
  14. And by then, if Petey and Hughes take it to another level along with Demko, you'll have all 3 of them making close to if not more than $10m AAV each
  15. That's fine... guess we will have to see if it ever happens (hasn't happened to many goalies in the playoffs...)
  16. Why can we replace forwards via UFA but you can't with defence? Such a one sided way of looking at things.
  17. Buddy, if Vasilevskiy or Shesterkin go down, Tampa and the NYR won't get a sniff of the Cup. It's a really weak argument when you try to take a goalie out of the equation.
  18. The same thing that would happen if any team's vezina caliber franchise goalie goes down with an injury. What kinda argument is that??
  19. Not saying he's not a good player... but he's actually looked better in previous years. The point is there is no guarantee that players will magically get better year after year.
  20. We have one of the best defensive teams in the league right now ... in fact, you can correct me if I'm wrong, but we've been the best 5v5... so... we go from the best to the bestest? Lol
  21. Lol I dunno what team you've been watching, but Bo hasn't looked great.
  22. Bo is entering his prime, and arguably Boeser... have they improved?
  23. Where is our depth issue right now? RHD? I thought you said Hamonic is a top 4? That means we have Myers and Hamonic on the RHD with Hughes and OEL on the left.
  24. Thank you. Finally someone else making some sense around here.
×
×
  • Create New...