Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Steve Carell

Members
  • Posts

    857
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Steve Carell

  1. A first round pick from Florida? Yeah you were dreaming.
  2. Man I can understand the Gillis hate for how he treated Luongo etc etc. BUT THIS IS A GREAT TRADE considering the circumstances. I would've traded Luongo for a 7th round pick... and we got a great 3rd line center (yes, I know our team is full of them), and a good goalie prospect.
  3. They claim to have "insiders" but they really don't. It's why I only watch TSN - Ferraro, McKenzie, Dreger - Now those are people I can trust.
  4. I don't know why people think he might go to Carolina... Kesler has a NTC, and he'll want to go to a contender. LIKE PITTSBURGH.
  5. Kesler will not fetch that much. Brandon Sutter will be part of the deal, yes, but you have to take one of the last three pieces out. For me, I would like Brandon Sutter + Beau Bennett + Pouliot for Kesler. If they don't want to give up Bennett and Pouliot, then Sutter + Pouliot + 1st round pick. That would fill Gillis' requirements for an established NHL roster player, Top-tier prospect, and a 1st round pick.
  6. This is perfect. If we keep losing, not only will we get a really high pick, but players will also waive their no trade clauses!! Brilliant!!
  7. He has 11 assists this year, playing about 10 less games than the Canucks d-men; which I guess would be just on par with what people like Hamhuis have been producing. This is while averaging 16-17 minutes a night, where guys like Hamhuis often go 25+ (see: game against Winnipeg).
  8. Wow, people COMPLAINING about this trade. We gave up DALE WEISE, PEOPLE. And we got a puck-moving d-man.
  9. I've seen some opinions in the GDT, but I wanted to see everything in one spot. Here's my final say on what happened at the beginning of the game: Yes, the Canucks had last change, so hypothetically they could've put out their 1st, 2nd, or 3rd line, instead of their 4th. However, what Torts was angry about was the fact that the decision for Calgary to put their 4th line out was BASED ON the assumption that Torts would put out the 1st line. If that was the case, Henrik Sedin would be at center, and look back to who the flames put at center for the opening draw? A player that had only taken face-offs 3 previous times? In my mind, they knew full well of Henrik's rib injury, and were looking to exploit it right at the beginning. As for what happened during the first intermission, I don't really know what to say. So anyways, what do you guys think? (((Also, PJ Stock is a moron))))
  10. WE NEED MAKAVELI TO MAKE A PJ STOCK VIDEO ASAP
  11. PJ is such an idiot. Friedman is the only real professional on that panel.
  12. The problem with what PJ Stock isn't what he said so much, its how he said. THIS GUY IS A PROFESSIONAL ANALYST. Yes, that means you have to control your emotions, speak rationally, and not act like a man-child.
  13. It always intrigues me how a marginal player in the NHL like PJ Stock can become such an expert. I mean he obviously must contribute something cause its definitely not professionalism. I think lost in all of this is the fact that David Booth missed a wide open net and should be fired lol.
  14. If you're going to give the rookies a chance, then don't put Kassian on the 4th line.
  15. Can we just tank it like if we're going to suck might as well just keep sucking
  16. To be honest though, players can take as many cheap shots as they want on our players because other teams know that our power play can't do anything. And I mean can't do ANYTHING. Like a four minute power play and you can't even come out with one chance or shot attempt?
  17. Nice nice nice. Alright lets try giving up a 3 goal lead next time!! We can do it!!
  18. I can't believe I'm saying this... but can we have edler back plz.
×
×
  • Create New...