Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

'NucK™

Members
  • Posts

    2,102
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 'NucK™

  1. Not once did I state it as a fact. I provided evidence, and explained why that evidence led ME to believe it was fitness related.
  2. Ok... but a lot of us here were saying we thought they were fitness related.... based on evidence that we had gathered from the media presser, and Green's quote about JV being in group C. Again, not speculation. You can call it making an assumption based on very strong evidence if you would like. Looks like it was a correct assumption.
  3. Did you watch the media presser? The off season goals he was referring to WERE physical, training goals. And he directly mentioned JV when discussing them. I think you're the one that may need to Google it There is evidence that Jake is out of shape both from Green's comments, being placed in a non NHL group of players, and now literally physical video evidence... Speculation? That is an assumption based on no evidence, which is nothing anyone here today did.
  4. No Green on the ice for Group C though. so I bet they had a slightly easier time. JV is legit not even moving his feet in that clip
  5. @stawns @FaninMex Oh and here's a tweet as well as some actual video evidence for you guys so that you can stop saying everyone else is "speculating".
  6. Clearly you meant low caliber when you said "same caliber as many others" (that just happen to be the comments you disagree with). anyways.. this has been fun
  7. Hurt my feelings? You should maybe read back - I was just clarifying what I said as you didn't seem to understand it. And if my comment was of such low "caliber", feel free to show me where I was "condemning and trampling" JV.
  8. It's not speculation when there's evidence such as Green directly mentioning Jake while talking about all the work players need to put in in the off season.
  9. But you took my previous comment that you quoted out of context because I never said we should be all over Jake about this. All I said is for people to take off their blinders if they seriously think this is all "speculation" and Jake's off season goals were not conditioning related.
  10. Didn't say anything about condemning or trampling anyone... But it's pretty obvious that Jake didn't meet some of his off season training goals. Ignoring that completely is just as silly as getting overly worked up about it.
  11. Page 2 was the media conference yesterday when Green said guys need to put in a lot of off season work and be ready for training camp. Virtanen was the only player mentioned during that comment. Now he is in group 3 because he didn't meet his off season goals... You guys need to take your blinders off.
  12. Yes, I'm sure his off season goals were to show up at media availability.
  13. He straight up said that if JV is in the third group it means he is not happy with his off season work... how is that nothing?
  14. 99.99% sure there's no reason. That roster on Canucks.com is almost always outdated or missing players.
  15. He was announced as part of the Pearson Leivo Stech group but then wasn't there. Even more strange is that Virtanen was at least supposed to be included, Baer completely omitted. Almost feels like they didn't want him having to deal with dumb questions re. concussions, but then you say they interviewed them later?
  16. NP. It looks like Virt was a no show cause they announced him but he was missing from the table
  17. Green & Jim: 0:00 Marky, Bo, Petey & Edler: 37:53 Myers, Sutter, Miller & Tanev: 58:41 Beagle, Eriksson, Benn & Ferland: 1:17:28 Stech, Leivo & Pearson: 1:29:20 (copied from youtube link in case anyone needs it)
  18. You think it took me that long to hate the guy??
  19. Dude the guy probably didn't hit the gym once all summer, was the only player to b**ch about anything the entire off season, and you want us to like him?
  20. Nothing ever got "overblown".... The guy is just a whiner and what he said back then wasn't really news, and still isn't now.
  21. I think he's saying 5-10 mins is minimal ice time, not 40 secs.. Russian coaches though
  22. Was just interviewed at prospects camp: https://www.facebook.com/Canucks/videos/418223418805859/
  23. I said a while ago lets agree to disagree but since you continue.. To me, admiration from a long standing, cup winning captain = nod that Bo should be captain. I get that you disagree, no need to keep repeating ourselves Have a great weekend!!
  24. He added a line right after the Toews quote: "It’s the kind of compliment that should make Horvat an easy choice to wear the ‘C’ with the Canucks this season." To the writer (and me), it is most definitely a nod to Horvat making a good captain, and thus being a good choice for the currently occupant position.
  25. Well IMO, those who only read the headlines can expect to be misinformed And again, disagree that saying Bo is a player he admires can't be taken as a "nod on captaincy", which has been a recent discussion topic.
×
×
  • Create New...