Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

riffraff

Members
  • Posts

    22,447
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by riffraff

  1. Lol.What message are they sending exactly? Fn joke.
  2. Spoiled? Humble pie?....gimme a break. Many of us fans have already sat through periods of brutal non compettitive hockey...at leadt back then the tickets were affordable.
  3. I dont care what gillis says....the process is on the ice and it stinks.
  4. All I know is the current product on the ice i unwatcheable
  5. I thought Edmonton vs calagry last night was ugly.
  6. I thought Edmonton vs calagry last night was ugly.
  7. I thought Edmonton vs calagry last night was ugly.
  8. I thought Edmonton vs calagry last night was ugly.
  9. Torts doesnt have rhe horses for a dynamic pp.Our top line shares a pass first mentality by design, style, previous coaching, and now due to lack of confidence. Our d lacks a legit offensive minded QB and the shots that come from there often miss the net. Lately those shots are more slap passes. There is no authority back there. No hoff. No salo. And edler/garrison sre hardly fill ins atm.
  10. Just havin a bit of fun.....ok...stirring the pot...
  11. I thought the refz were conspiring againzt the canuckz?!?!?
  12. This is a good point. I doubt Kes waves his clause to 3c in the Burgh as you describe.
  13. He is awesome. He sucks. End thread.
  14. Im not so sure kesler is an easy trade anyway. Im sure the kesler chemistry problem is no secret and why would a contending gm risk potential top six chemistry suicide at the trade deadline heading into the playoffs?
  15. I can see how people could rekindle their edler boner after watching the small sample size of him playing with a top partner against inferior competition in the Olympics. Hes no plug. but you have to give up to get. With Stanton, tanev and Corrado to some extent developing well, I see edler as basically our only legit trade carrot.
  16. Personally I dont see how trying to eliminate cheap headshots is ruining the game. As taking hitting and fighting out of hockey would ruin the game so to would losing star players to injury.Other than that I agree completely with the sentiment of your post and asessment of Keith.
  17. You dont have to even play sports to know what forceful contact directly to the head generally results in.Keith intended to headshot daniel, to hurt him. Otherwise he woukd have played the puck. Did he intend to cause brain injury? Maybe not, but hes experienced and smart enough to be aware of the potential for injury with a hit like that.To separate intent from result is naive.
  18. This exactly. Would you rather have to face your child one day and say: you know son, after you were born I just kinda stopped giving it my all."No man wants that conversation. Regardless of profession.
×
×
  • Create New...