There are pros(+) & cons(-) with almost any roster transaction. None of us here get JB's/fr office bigBUX$!$! to make these calls. We can only put our ideas out here for others to discuss, and/or crap on! Generalities are good conversation-fodder:
a- be a team w/high turnover.(Is this a + ?) Could be argued some recent successful teams(Hawks, Pens, TBay) have had fairly high turnover. They seem to be continually turning over roster-peripheral guys. Is it a cap-necessity, or strategy? I'd contend a good GM is always trying to get bigger/faster/younger/more skilled, etc...(in this cap paradigm), moreso, than compared to past decades, when GM's didn't have such constraints of a floor/ceiling.
Further, IF their team has been good for a while, it's likely their assets will be perceived as being higher quality, and/or have benefited from non-rushed, proper development.
(But the con -) With a younger team(not just this very moment..for those in a rush to contradict every F***ing point!)..but younger in a sense of many arriving ELC's over the coming yrs. Within such a team, perhaps the chemistry/friendship is more important, than say a team that's already won it all, & doesn't mind taking some risks?
There are more pros & cons. Will kick'em around if there's appetite for such discussion.