Avicii

Should've tried trading for Malkin last year when he wasn't re-signed. Kesler/Edler for starters. Definitely worth.

I shouldn't really be saying anything, since the last time i watched it was like a year and a half ago so i don't really remember much.. I will say though that Paranormal Activity 1 definitely wasn't just a bunch of jump scares and whatnot. Every single one after the first one sucked bad, but the 1st one deserves some credit.

See, the Blair Witch Project was a fantastic movie when it came out. I'm pretty sure it was the first ever movie of its kind, but compared to some of the movies now... Meh. Hell, i'd say i got more scared at the first Paranormal Activity than the Blair Witch Project.

Man, i'm gonna have to agree with you on the 3rd one being the best. When those oldies walked out of that room.. Oh man, I screamed like a little girl

I would've traded both Sedin twins for Malkin if the option was there.. Too bad he just re-signed

Insidious 2: crapped my pants/10 I'M SO SCARED WTF

I know right! It sounded so much better when the vocals were more faded.. The singer was also better EDIT: Thank the HEAVENS the instrumental sounds the exact same though.. Might be the saving grace.

What the hell are these vocals.. http://a1302.phobos....plus.aac.ep.m4a WTF the other version is SO MUCH BETTER.. And what the hell did he turn Liar Liar into.. Well it's not fair to judge by the previews but from the sounds of it i'm liking the other versions better...

Kunitz/Couture/Neal - Crosby - Stamkos Giroux - Toews - Nash Tavares - Thornton/Getzlaf - Staal/Perry Lucic - Bergeron - Sharp/Richards/Carter Every line has grit, size, skill, and is defensively reliable. (1st line doesn't really have size, but i doubt that really matters)

People who don't think Nash is a lock for this team are delusional. Nash is a great overall hockey player. His defensive game is completely underrated for some reason, even to hockey analysts. I remember when Canada played Russia in 2010, I'm certain Nash was given the job to shut Ovechkin down. Hell, Nash did that and completely eliminated him from the game. What did Ovie even do? Nothing i'm pretty sure. Maybe it wasn't all Nash, but it was his job and he succeeded. (?) - Toews - Nash... Yeah, even a line of Malkin - Datsyuk - Ovechkin wouldn't score a single goal.

More about chemistry and fit rather than points. St. Louis is a great player don't get me wrong, i love the guy and think he's a prime example of a little guy succeeding in the NHL. But should he really be on the roster playing in every single game? I don't think so. Like i said, he'll most likely be on the team, but he probably won't play the really important games. Maybe against like Latvia or some country like that. Games against Russia/USA, i honestly would prefer someone who's more feisty and gritty. To beat the Russians you need to be in their face and piss them off. If it was purely a game of skill, the Russians would probably win easily. The Americans are the same. Low-scoring, lots of trap play and lots of defense. Can Marty handle it? Some would argue that he can, but i'd be more comfortable with someone like Perry. To me, the 4 RW spots should go to: Stamkos/Nash/Perry/Carter/Sharp. I don't really know if Carter should be on the list since i don't know if he plays LW or RW.. But nonetheless, I don't really see where St. Louis fits. Unless he switches to LW? I don't know, just don't see where he fits. One thing is for sure though, if he isn't in the top-6, he is relatively useless compared to other players out there to fill the "grinder/defensive" forward positions.

St. Louis doesn't really fit anywhere on the team. He will probably make the roster, but he'll most likely me a Fleury type guy where he doesn't play a single game but gets the medal nonetheless. He's useless in a bottom 6 role, and Nash/Stamkos should take up the 2 RW spots in the top-6.

Can't believe this isn't on True.. wtf.. Imagine if it's just a little bit brushed up and better tuned..

Meh, it was pretty good but i really am not a fan of the recent sci-fi movies that have came out recently. I'll give Elysium a 7.5/10... Oblivion, i was not a big fan of at all. This one, well the movie was great but i'm just really not into sci-fi i guess. Or maybe it's the movies, because i loved District 9.

Sweet, thanks Ill give a review later tonight

Just wondering if people think Elysium would be a good movie to watch tonight with the parents? Got nothing better to do, summer's almost over.. Might aswell spend some time with the family. Anyways, their english isn't the best and i was wondering if Elysium would be an easy enough movie to understand? They mostly like violence and action and this is pretty much the only one out except Pacific Rim which i've seen and isn't playing.

It's on youtube

just finished watching now you see me.I know that some people say that movie falls off after the beginning,but I thought it was entertaining until the very end. 8.5/10

Dammit. I can't read more mediocre articles or watch more mediocre segments?

Wolverine was pretty meh 1/2 price today, went in just in hopes of wasting a couple hours, and it did just that. I don't really wanna rate it, but it does the job. That ending though too.. If you watch it, stay during the credits.

I just watched Oblivion and i don't know what the hell i just watched I wasn't really paying attention for some of it but still.. Don't even know wtf was happening