-
Posts
20,719 -
Joined
-
Days Won
20
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Everything posted by Aladeen
-
So if AV was right that the scum get one kill it would make sense to use that kill when it is down to a win for the scum. Mislynch DM Mislynch next player Av gets his one MK and wins the game next round. anyone?
-
Scummy post needs to be highlighted... it feels like AV droppin hints it’s him so he can go back to them at the end saying see guys you should’ve known it was me.
-
Are you saying you are the scummiest player left? This seems like reverse scum-hunting We should be doing the opposite: AV is scum because he knew the mechanics of this game when the rest of us didn’t MR is scum because he seems sure of each of his votes and has rarely wavered in his votes showing he doesn’t care who gets lynched as long as it’s not him Falcon is scum because he is the least invested and least active of all the remaining players and could very well not submit kills for the lolz on top of being inactive DM is scum because he lied about being special and his rationale is so that he wouldn’t be lynched but in doing so revealed he knew that mafia can’t submit kills and caused deliberate confusion for town players
-
What is the best city to play in in the NHL?
Aladeen replied to hockeygod77's topic in General Hockey Discussion
Whichever city is willing to give you the $$$$$... every city is great if you're rich enough. -
You are the only tater in this game. Like King tater, the leader of the taters from the mythical kingdom of tatertopia, you have added nothing to this game for the town. You post cryptic $&!# and ignore people when they call you out on your BS. How is that townie in the slightest? Tell me please cause I don't see it, you are literally the worst player that actually "tries", that CDC has ever seen. I always defended you because I thought you just had a schtick going on. Ultimately I believed you actually cared and tried, but no you just troll, so BJ and BW were right. If you aren't the last scum, you are really just a troll. I think we should lynch you and if you flip scum you are just a terrible player (which is fine but at some point you need to start to learn) if you flip town it will literally be the last game I play with you in it. My vote stays on DM this round and every round until he is lynched, IDGAF anymore. If you're not going to lynch DM then might as well lynch me because I am done with his BS.
-
It's one of these 2... one of them know that this is how this game is.
-
I can't argue with it being MR.... and I will say that at least I have been trying to reason out who is scum and switching my vote showing I am not sure who it is, I thought about voting to lynch you when the vote was tied last night, he seems content placing a vote and leaving it there. If it is MR, I think he might just win it though and I am tempted to vote for him just so he doesn't humiliate us but the humiliation of it being DM would be much much worse. He would think he create some kind of new radical scum technique of not submitting kills.
-
Yah or your specific scenario is correct and you couldn’t help yourself but to reveal it to the town. It’s definitely looking more like it each round.
-
Wagonomics? You literally just post things you have no idea about... wagonomics only has any kind of relevance when there are multiple scum voting you mashed potato. The last remaining scum will vote for anyone not them just like every town member.
-
DM you keep deflecting from my question of you invincibility this game. I gave my reason for voting hogs and it was because he decided not to vote for anyone. The problem with your line of thinking is Wtf would it matter if a townie which at least one of me or AV is switched their vote cause if either one of us were scum we were just voting for a different town player. Whoever the last scum is is fine voting any one else because it’s not them.
-
Well if it is mechanics for no NK and this will be the last Fetch game I play if that is the case then really it could be anyone. There is no way to gauge scumhunting when there is no NK. if Fetch took away NK for the sheriff then mechanically the mafia should not be able to win since at 1v1 the game would end in a tie. For me it seems AV is the most likely now followed by falc but I can’t shake the feeling MR is it. DM should almost be a policy lynch not expanding on his unlynchability and saying he can’t be MKed does look like TMI in retrospect. I say we lynch DM until he explains his unlynchability and not being able to be MKed. Vote DM
-
Yup I think so unvote; vote Hogs
-
Hogs droppin his vote altogether is not a good look and brings me back to apathy as the reason for no MK
-
VC Falc - Me AV AV - Falc MR Hogs - DM We can’t tie again
-
I don’t doubt you would.
-
Cause you are too scummy to MK and too potato to lynch?
-
Yup but I would amend it in retrospect to add the stipulation that that player can’t be a complete potato. Also you never quite explained why you are lynch and MK proof.
-
Yah I feel I was getting away from traditional scum hunting too with my over analysis (but really feel like I was on to something). If I take a look back at the game as a whole, falcon has done the least of all players remaining from a scum hunting POV and he literally would fit for every single one of the scenarios I propose. DM has a few question marks by his name that I can't completely ignore, he was soft claiming earlier and has yet to explain his reasoning there saying he can't be lynched and can't be MKed still leaves a wtf in the back of my mind. at the very least until we hear from him Unvote; Vote Falcon
-
I'm not against a falcon lynch... he was literally here twice and posted nothing.
-
Ok I see your point about everything, I really do, but I will say does that argument then not work for everyone? especially me and MR? Both of us were the most active players this game, 2 seconds to submit a kill leads to a conscious decision by either of us to not submit a kill. Why then do you say that the last scum has to be me or MR? AV/Falc/DM would all be more likely scum candidates according to your own thought process. I have shown why I think the no MK submission is terrible gameplay strategy, especially this game where it automatically implicates 50% of the scum team. I don't believe MR would play it that way - I may be offbase in which case I wouldn't know whether to be impressed by that if he won or actually lose respect for his gameplay. So then you must be of the mind that it was deliberate no kill each night or that AV's idea of MK restrictions is the way it is. The other possibility is there were MKs submitted on N1 and 3 R1 - 112/OTIS was targeted - ended up lynched and therefore no MK - 112 could have been an early MK that was just never changed R2 - LL - I doubt any scum would have targeted LL though, even a super slanker as he was an automislynch in retrospect R3 - TL - maybe TL submitted this kill and it never went through So the possibility does exist that the scum only failed to submit a kill in the second round. - if this last scenario is the case I would possibly bring falc to the top of the scum list.
-
@falcon45ca I saw you pop in, anything to add to the convo?
-
Player pre/post game rub and tug?
-
Ok I was hoping to go the game without engaging you directly because, reasons, but please show me how my argument is garbage. Let's throw away AV's idea that fetch made this game with the MK restricted (never seen it before so no reason to think this game has it now) The logical reason for no MK is simply the mafia didn't submit it. You have been the least invested in this game up until this point and therefore the most likely to not submit a kill. If it was strategy to not submit the MK (n2 specifically) it was a terrible strategy as that would have brought us to LYLO. In which case we would go off of who is the least strategic player and for me it's DM. Others might do it for lolz (Falc and AV come to mind) but DM may actually think it was a smart strategy. The problem with it being a strategy is that no MK automatically implicated their scummate in TL, and I personally feel experienced players would not believe this to be the best path to victory. Therefore you are the most logical player to be responsible for the most logical reason there was no MK. AV is the most logical player responsible if the game is setup in the very specific way that he outlined. DM is the most logical player responsible if the final player believed not MKing was a stroke of mafia genius. The only beyond a shadow of a doubt I have on you, is that TL would have had time to submit an MK, if he chose not to submit one, the reason could be that AV is right about fetch's restrictions. Taking the tinfoil hat off though, the most logical reason is that TL did submit a kill (his scumbuddy was MIA) and since he was lynched the kill he submitted never went through.
-
This is one game that I can't see you being scum (and I can force myself to see it under many many scenarios), I truly don't believe that you would have left n2 without an MK... the only way you are scum is if Fetch did limit the MK in the manner that AV said, and if that is the case he is far more likely scum than you. Who would even consider that scenario an option, let alone it being coincidentally the way fetch set up the game?