Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Aladeen

Members
  • Posts

    20,719
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    20

Everything posted by Aladeen

  1. Not hiding at all sometimes you gotta let the scum play to see what they post.
  2. Well zfetch is scum. 112 ignoring the inherent scumminess of fetch’s post here is also itself scummy. This post of fetch’s is so contrived it’s hilarious. How no one called him out on it is beyond me. Two scum caught let’s keep going.
  3. His first post was townier and more useful than anything he did in that entire last game.
  4. Well opposite of last game, that post right before the game started looks good for LL.
  5. I just finished with it... good luck... you can blame taco bell.
  6. Didn't OP say in another of his threads he wasn't going to start threads anymore this summer?
  7. Hey that rash cleared up weeks ago... Thank God for penicillin.
  8. Yes all hail our corporate overlords... they are perfect, they are love. Free will is overrated.
  9. They can’t because they already tried him for second degree... what I was saying is that had they have initially tried him for man slaughter he would have been found guilty and most likely his appeals would have been not nearly as much as with second degree. The burden of proof is way lower for manslaughter than for second degree. The same scenario applied to OJ when they decided to try him for 2 counts of first degree rather than second degree. That would have been a slam dunk case once again but the prosecutors got greedy and missed their chance to put him away for 90 years vs life in prison or death row. First degree - if the glove doesn’t fit you must acquit... Johnny was right by the law but wrong morally.
  10. Here is the issue: you stated that if I post what I did I should/could be called out for it... that’s fair but you said that because he was acquitted on second degree charges he was no longer eligible for manslaughter As if what I posted said or implied that he could be... It did not... and so I think it’s fair to call you out on that since that’s not what I said or implied. In the grand scheme of things it doesn’t matter besides tit-for-tat... that is literally all there is to it.
  11. Where exactly do you get mad from? I’m not mad in the slightest... annoyed that you twisted what I said but that’s even a stretch. You the tell tell me to chill when I correct you on what you are saying that I said. If that comes across as mad I would suspect that you don’t handle confrontations well.
  12. Yah where did it say they were going to retry him? Please quote that cause that’s what you said I said. If the charges were initially for man slaughter it WOULD have been a slam dunk case so you chill dude. Or learn to actually read the post before reacting to posts other people make.
  13. Dude you are arguing absolutely nothing, just for the sake of arguing, I NEVER said they could pursue manslaughter... so wtf are even talking about. No, only you have called me out on it because you are looking to argue about nothing at all. Fine you believe he is innocent that is up to you, but I believe that he had some damn good lawyers to raise reasonable doubt in the eyes of the law that it could have been someone else, therefore making the conviction criteria not met when taking the law at it's exact stated word. That is not opinion that is fact... Not guilty does not equal innocent because they are not the same thing. So again I don't know what you are trying to argue.
  14. Never said it was, but a Not Guilty verdict by no means makes this man innocent.
  15. Maybe for a second degree murder conviction but I bet the evidence would have been easily sufficient for manslaughter. Just because he is acquitted on the charges at hand does by no means make him NOT GUILTY of the crime. I bet you think OJ was innocent cause the law never makes mistakes.
  16. Did you even read the story? He had a trial was found guilty and then had a retrial because of these factors: 1. There was a footprint at the crime scene which wasn't presented in the first trial which may or may not have had blood on it. 2. The victim had a small amount of alcohol in his system that wasn't presented at the first trial 3. Some random notes found later in the woods had the name "Dick" on it which was the nickname the victim sometimes went by 4. A new witness stated he saw a man leave the building but didn't know if it was on the day of the murder or not. 5. The lead investigator admitted to making mistakes at the crime scene - but swears he did not fabricate any of the evidence against he defendant 6. Several police officers entered the scene of the crime without the proper gear on. Literally the only difference from the first trial to the second is his lawyers did a better job of saying there was a possibility that it was someone else. NOT THAT HE WAS INNOCENT!!! The initial conviction was a result of the overwhelming circumstantial evidence and the inability to show that it could possibly have been anyone else. All the second trial did was show that it COULD Have been someone other than the son.
  17. Guy did it, but his lawyers worked the system and got paid well doing it. The system's fault on this one. Just look at the woman's face who is holding his hand leavubg the courthouse, that is the face of someone who has just witnessed a miscarriage of justice.
  18. For the longest time the OP said game stated at 8 pm. Until at the very least close to 8pm I checked not too long before then because I was curious if anyone I tagged in the thread still had time to join the game and it still said game on at 8. Since there was no announcement though I never knew the game was on until you claimed it to be such. So you’re telling me that you read the title of the thread it said “game on” then went to re-read the OP and saw that it had been switched to 9pm and with this knowledge in hand decided to write a post about when the game had started to refute 112’s initial joke post? is that possible? I suppose, but it’s way more probable that you are scum and got a message for scum chat at time x and that was your signal for the game starting. Qwags is a mafia savant that bides his time until he solves the game but doesn’t actually tell anyone ever. DM is a mafia savant that solves the game but doesn’t actually tell anyone the solution until after the game has ended. AV is just a potato.
×
×
  • Create New...