Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

aGENT

Members
  • Posts

    52,033
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    68

Everything posted by aGENT

  1. We have also failed to hold them accountable over and over again. The people are just as complicit in this problem as the 'government'.
  2. The two main political parties in BC are a complete joke. They're like caricatures of bad politicians. The biggest problem being that the people seem to be completely complacent in this. Until people demand better, we'll continue to get shafted by those two parties.
  3. What about under James and Dix? Different than that party too? Seems they're the same dysfunctional, disorganized and misguided morons whose only move is to oppose ANYTHING the party in power does, good or bad. But yeah, I'm sure they'll be a beacon of light because they're so 'different' now...
  4. Not electing either the Liberals or NDP next election would be a good start.
  5. It's not just about muscle.
  6. Sure. But most D take 4-6 years to develop in to an NHL player. People expecting 1 year might be setting themselves up for disappointment. 2-4 years would still be ahead of schedule. If he can beat that we'll have even more reason to be excited.
  7. I doubt this very much. They're not going to risk losing depth on waivers just to give him 9 games and send him down.
  8. While I generally agree with the sentiment, he'll also have to adjust to playing against men, at a far faster pace etc. I'm as high on this kid as anyone but it's far more likely he's at least 1-2 years away than not.
  9. He's clearly BPA IMO. and like I said earlier:
  10. aGENT

    Brendan Gaunce | C/LW

    First call up until the TDL I'm guessing. Then he's in.
  11. This. Juolevi was clear BPA IMO. Even if we were flush with potential top pairing D prospects, I still would have taken him. Especially considering the value of young D in trade in this league. Chances are we could trade one of those theoretical D for a future winger, likely even better than Tkachuck.
  12. I'd still have taken OJ. People still underestimating I see...
  13. How do you stay so thin with all the wine and desserts?
  14. Yeah the guy seems like a knob IRL but he makes damned entertaining movies.
  15. I was quite pleased with that one. Way better than I thought it would be. Loved the hitch hiking Italian country side scene
  16. I'd expect he'd be more Hamhuis sized...~205#'s when in his prime.
  17. Yeah I was thinking like Sbisa+ or similar. You guys are crazy offering up current top 4 D for a promising but COMPLETELY unproven prospect C IMO I like the kid as I stated last page and I think he's going to be good but that's lunacy at this point.
  18. I'd love to see this as well. If we passed on Juolevi, I was hoping Benning was targeting him in a trade down scenario.
  19. We'll see but I'd not be shocked to see Miller moved at the deadline for a backup with a couple years left and perhaps a pick/prospect coming back at the deadline.
  20. I like the optimism/enthusiasm but it's probably 1 for Brock, 1-2 for Juolevi and 2-3 for Demko IMO.
  21. Tried googling around the paywall without luck...where did he rate Tkachuck out of curiosity?
×
×
  • Create New...