There was risk either way. I'd simply have preferred to go with the younger, cheaper guys given the team direction and spend that money elsewhere (defense). There's always veteran, journeyman guys you can sign if they felt it was needed still this season (I didn't personally).
One, IMO wins/losses don't hugely matter this season short of team morale.
Two, I honestly don't think we'd have lost much/any more if we'd spent Miller's money on defense instead. Making point one somewhat moot.
Lack + Markstrom + better D vs Markstrom + Miller + worse D...pretty much a wash IMO but one sets us up better moving forward.