Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

RWMc1

Members
  • Posts

    7,186
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RWMc1

  1. i predict that Poolman will be worth his contract and quite likely out performs it. Any doubters want to show integrity and make a prediction instead of wishy washy responses?
  2. Nice tangent. I was asking specifically about mm"s responses to "divisive" language. If he doesn't challenge divisive language aimed at optimistic posters, then mm is a hypocrite.
  3. Labelling optimistic posters is also divisive. Where are you when negative posters do that?
  4. I have no idea how other posters regard you. I don't think that I challenged you on your opinion of Poolman. If I did, please quote me and we can go from there.
  5. Many people have questioned the move. Not all of them have been challenged. The ones who seem to get quoted are the ones with a history of negativity and the ones who refuse to acknowledge points being made. Anyone can stat gaze. A lot of posters here look beyond that to factors in why he was targeted by us and why he took so long to establish himself. You know, like actual fans. I called you disingenuous when you were wilfully ignoring points that I was making.
  6. I believe that that is an outright lie. I don't for a second think it was a mistake that you quoted me. I do accept you apology however. If you interact with me, do so honestly or I will call you on it.
  7. More inability to grasp basic concepts. No surprise. The issue is that you quoted me out of context and characterized me as a poster while not responding to the the post that you quoted. Responding after I queried you is irrelevant.
  8. This was after I asked you why you quoted. More disingenuous crap.
  9. Only on one side though apparently. I've yet to see you challenge one of the snivelling whiners.
  10. You didn't respond to the post that you quoted though. In the post that you quoted, I stated that Benning is respected by other GMs. You didn't respond to that until I asked you why you quoted me. If your posts are "rooted in facts", then get your facts straight.
  11. I don't need your permission to consider you a whiner. You claim to be intelligent, yet you can't seem to grasp simple concepts. Your partner mastermind was going on and on yesterday about how we should be more civil and not name call. Pom pom waver is name calling. I stopped using the term snivelling whiner yesterday and was using the term negative posters. If it's okay for whiners to label optimistic people then you have no leg to stand on when you are characterized in return.
  12. You self identify as a whiner if that's what you took from my post.
  13. If people can characterize optimistic posters as pom pom wavers then they should have no issue when negative posters are referred to as snivelling whiners.
  14. Also, you just characterized posters yet when it's done to you, you play the victim.
  15. Why did you quote me for this simplistic "clarification" I stated that Benning is well respected by his peers. Do you dispute that?
  16. It goes against the never ending narrative, but Benning is well respected by his fellow GMs.
  17. Schmidt had a bad season, so it's possible that his value dropped.
  18. Other teams were trying to squeeze vegas. We got him because we gave them the best value return. If we tried to get more, they would have traded him to someone else. We basically got a free year of his services.
  19. I'm putting him and Loui in the rear-view mirror. Then I'm tearing the mirror off and throwing it away.
×
×
  • Create New...