Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

GoCanucks16

Members
  • Posts

    2,239
  • Joined

Everything posted by GoCanucks16

  1. Forest Hudson was born too late. He's more of a '50s-'60s guy.
  2. Is CDC actually turning on Jet Black the Saviour?

    1. ImConfused
    2. luckylager

      luckylager

      The tides are turning. The big money bottom six and 10m+ in dead cap is now holding the team back, and that reality is too hard to ignore any longer.

       

      Further, Green's systems have been hacked, and the players aren't buying in to the structure any longer. I think the top 6 wants to play a more skilled possession game (which I think they're capable of) and Green is employing a low skill, dump and chase system; teams have all adjusted to it. Stretch passes are getting choked out and the opposition always has a dman deep to recover the dump in before our forecheckers can get deep.

      We're just dog $&!# in our own zone, bleeding shots and goals against, yet the geniuses behind the bench just keep the system running, don't adapt, don't tweak or put any effort into improving the system, just put the expectation on the players to "play better" in a garbage can.

       

      So it's not just JB that people are turning on. JB is at the top of what appears to be a broken team.

  3. Info: First Name: Barney "Forest" Last Name: Hudson Date of Birth: (mm/dd) 12/31 Place of Birth: Winnipeg, Manitoba Nationality: Canada Second Nationality (Optional): Primary Position: LW Seconary Position(s) (Optional): Height (cm): 165 Weight (kg): 50 Handedness: R Jersey Number: 15 Junior Preference: None/College/Major Junior/Europe Starting Team*: (Must be from a Canadian Midget league, US U16, NAHL, European Junior League, etc.) (Leave blank for random) Player Type: Forward - All Around / Defensive / Enforcer / Finesse / Grinder / Playmaker / Power Forward / Sniper Defense - Defensive / Enforcer / Offensive / Playmaker / Pointman / Rugged / Standard Role: Offensive Role: 20 Defensive Role: 8 Total Role Points: 28 Staff Attributes: Adaptability: 1 Ambition: 11 Determination: 20 Loyalty: 20 Pressure: 20 Professionalism: 1 Sportsmanship: 1 Temperament: 1 Total Staff Points: Skill Attributes: Deflections: 1 Deking: 8 Offensive Positioning: 11 Passing: 8 Slapshot: 9 Stickhandling: 10 Wristshot: 9 Checking: 1 Faceoffs: 1 Pokecheck: 1 Defensive Positioning: 1 Total Skill Points: 0 Mental Attributes: Agitation: 1 Aggression: 1 Hockey IQ: 20 Bravery: 1 Consistency: 10 Decisions: 20 Flair: 1 Important Games: 10 Leadership: 1 Teamwork: 20 Vision: 20 Workrate: 20 Total Mental Points: 0 Pass Tendency (DOES NOT COUNT TOWARDS TOTAL): 10 Physical Attributes: Acceleration: 12 Agility: 10 Balance: 10 Hitting: 1 Speed: 12 Stamina: 10 Strength: 10 Total Physical Points: 1 Fighting/Enforcing Attributes: Dirtyness: 1 Fighting: 1 Total Enforcer Points: 38 (Optional)
  4. idk but i have one that says otherwise https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18056697/ ooo and this https://health.clevelandclinic.org/research-on-the-transgender-brain-what-you-should-know/
  5. oh no the fallacy police people who reject transgender identities are transphobic intellectually believing indigenous people are inferior to other races is still racist
  6. I don't know anything about Ben Shapiro except that he can't please his wife and might have a thing for AOC's feet. I'm not going to watch the video.
  7. I don't understand why people who have homophobic, sexist or racist views don't just openly admit it. Like if I hate black people, I'm going to be like "ya, I'm racist, what of it" because what do I care if people think I am what I am? That's a narrow copypaste of a definition. Calling trans people "guys who want to be girls" or vice versa is absolutely a transphobic stance whether you like it or not.
  8. I don't have a good enough understanding of physiology to give an educated answer to most of smokes's questions, like everyone here. I was thinking about ridiculing him for his 2nd question but decided not to.
  9. See the post above. It's a transphobic opinion. I am backing up my claim; stop skipping words/letters. If you don't think trans women are women, you're transphobic. That's the definition.
  10. And I don't know whether you're transphobic, btw, but opinions can absolutely be transphobic.
  11. There are individuals here who aren't transphobic. My point was that there is still a large population of transphobes here. I don't look at everything in life as a fight; my intention was not to pit myself against the forum. I was not making a universal statement.
  12. The thread has been up for like 30 minutes and we already have people saying trans people aren't the gender they identify as. I could easily revisit older threads for "evidence" but don't really care to. I don't get a dopamine hit from "winning" arguments.
  13. Also, no idea why you're getting so uppity. This site has historically had a large population of transphobes. That's not a controversial statement.
  14. I never called Lancaster disgusting. It was probably an honest mistake. The language was ungrammatical at best and offensive at worst. The way they used it was too close to a common slur for transgender people. Transgender women are not "guys who want to be girls," nor are trans men "girls who want to be guys." Trans women are women and trans men are men, end of story.
  15. Lol. What opinion was I responding to? I'm just telling you from experience that this forum, broadly, has bad opinions on the transgender topic.
  16. I'm not going to bother to search for old threads, but there have been plenty across the years where the contents are disgusting. Just in this one, though: Unless they missed adding "people," that's like referring to a schizophrenic person as a schizophrenic or someone with down syndrome as a "downy."
×
×
  • Create New...