Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

qwijibo

Members
  • Posts

    8,144
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by qwijibo

  1. Are you serious? The knee was totally accidental, he was trying to avoid Stamkos.
  2. Both Ron McLean and Kerry Frasier said that based on the wording of the rule that the non-call was a legit call. Like it or not it's not nearly as controversial as you think it is
  3. Can you imagine torts trusting his 3rd and 4th lines in this situation?
  4. Goaltending hasn't really been an issue for Tampa. Lindback held them in the game I'm the first when it could have been 3 or 4 nothing
  5. I'd like to see the Habs pot a couple insurance goals early on. The longer they let Tampa hang around the more likely they get burned
  6. Interesting discussion on the no goal call. By the strict letter of the rule it sounds like it was a legit call. Still. I'd be pissed if it was the other way around
  7. What an idiotic statement. They benefited from a bad call. How does that equate to them cheating?
  8. I'm curious. Why would the rangers even consider that?
  9. Cue the 1000 or so pages of Kesler trade speculation over the next 6 months
  10. The main issue is Burrows has always relied on the twins to inflate his stats. Now he has a contract to go with the stats he used to have but not the performance. There isnt anyone in their top 6 he's better than. He would be at best a third liner there, and he makes to much money for that. Maybe if the Canucks eat half his salary, but what are the odds of that?
  11. Collberg is one of their top prospects so I doubt they bite, plus it doesn't solve the problem that he's pverpaid and underperforming and wouldnt displace anyone in their top 6. Wasted cap space.
  12. I don't see why Montreal would make that deal. Emelin brings a dimention to their defence that no-one else does, and with the way Burrows has struggled this season he would be at best a third liner in Montreal. He's making to much money to be a third liner (they're already paying Brieire to much to play on the third line)
  13. looking forward to the 100's of pages of Luongo-esque trade speculation over the next 6 months when Gillis fails to trade anyone before the deadline
  14. I doubt Montreal would have any interest. They already have an excellent 2-way center in Plekanec. He's not as physical but is thier best pk guy, is good in the dot and has a higher point-per-game average than Kesler. I'm not saying he's better than Kesler. But they fill the same role. I'm sure Montreal would rather have Plekanec, Galchenyuk (and his star potential) the cap space, and whatever other component to a potential trade. Than Plekanec and Kesler
  15. In a salary cap world Kesler isn't going to be traded for strictly picks and prospects. The only teams that could afford to take on his cap hit without sending NHL salary the other way are bottom feeder teams that he would likely never waive his NTC for
  16. Renaud Lavoie‏@LavoieRenaud4h Andrei Markov:"I want to stay in Montreal". #canadiens Expand Collapse
  17. IF Subban will only sign a 1 year contract THEN Montreal could look at trading him for a substantial return that will help the club immediately rather than drfat picks spread out over 3 or 4 years that may or may not pan out. The offer sheet route almost never works, Anything Vancouver could afford to pay him, Montreal could afford to pay him
×
×
  • Create New...