If the claim I was making is that the general belief among people who follow our team is that Juolevi is not developing as expected, then what I have read on Juolevi on places where Canucks fans converse en masse is a valid thing to point to in support of my view.
You're not disproving me by telling me to come up with 'legit sources' when you're not pulling up anything yourself to demonstrate that I'm in the wrong.
Anyway, we're arguing about whether an opinion is popular, not whether it's correct or not, which is kinda silly. I hate how some posters on this forum pick out an arbitrary string of text to bold within a much longer post and then keep raising the issue of it because if they can confuse themselves enough about a random add-on to a post, it means they don't have to accept the rest of it. They play 'burden of proof' games as though this is a courtroom, never even raising issue with the more substantive parts of the message they're attacking. Idk if it's some sort of defence mechanism or what