My "evidence" against OTTS was clearly a joke to everyone but you and Caboose, apparently. Even after I'd told you that it was a joke, you tried to keep digging, even though others felt you were acting suspicious because there was clearly nothing there. I try to ask you if/why you think I'm lying, which you decide to ignore while responding to Peaches.
Yeah, votes can change in the last hour if evidence emerges. I had no evidence. Why would anyone have followed me?
My vote was a random one early in the round that was used to get discussion going. Yours was what got the ball rolling on the BM bandwagon when you called him out for an actual reason (which was weak, but I'll get into that in a second). I don't see how they're all that comparable.
What part of BM calling you the "possible/likely" leader of the Posse struck you as suspicious? If he did know, why would knowing that make him Mafia anyway? I'll take a wild guess and suggest that PPCLI told him, and figured it wasn't a big deal if he knew (because it wasn't).
Doesn't really matter. Voting is done in private PMs, so we have absolutely no idea who's voting for who. Just because someone agrees to vote out a player, doesn't mean that they're actually going to.