Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Bertuzzipunch

Members
  • Posts

    3,227
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Bertuzzipunch

  1. My point is that its more valuable to get rid of schmidts contract where its not worth it when our time to be competitive is in a few years. Myers is fine i dont mind him here for the next 3 years.
  2. Also doesnt mean nobody will come here either
  3. No we dont have to spend 6 mill for every defenseman on the team.
  4. Who says we have to spend 6 mill? What are you talking about? Make a list go from the top to the bottom its not rocket science
  5. Im sure theres a list of players they want. Not one or 2.
  6. Lots of options when u have extra cap to find someone.
  7. Getting a player we want is bad? That makes no sense
  8. Nah UFA is atill there for that. Open up almost 6 mill we will have more than enough money to cover his replacement.
  9. It sure would boost our left side having a guy like that. Chicago and their fans want him gone. I dont see why we cant do a trade with holtby for Big Z and subban with picks and prospects involved to make it work. We cant go into next season with the exact same D. Giving edler 4 mill isnt a option
  10. Im alright with that. Just play like defenseman we all thought we were getting and i will be ecstatic.
  11. Personally would like that. In 2 years i cant see why woo wouldnt be ready by then who already has good chemistry with rathbone. Yet we have Schmidt for 2 more years at that time.
  12. After watching him in the playoffs he has a big problem scoring goals. Being 30 also id rather not spend the 5 mill or more on him. Good player but he had so many chances to win games for toronto only to shoot it wide or right at carey price.
  13. Uggh can the offseason please start already?
  14. So ive been thinking. Myers is signed for 3 more years and schmidt 4. Realistically our time to be a consistent playoff team is probably in 2 years. At this time both players are well into their 30s. If we were able to get rid of one of them this offseason which one would you like it to be? Would you be okay getting rid of schmidt for a 3rd for what we payed for him. the way i see it if we draft a big RHD in the 2nd which has a lot of talent this year he could probably be ready once myers contract runs out in 3 years. Which im okay with Schmidt tho i dont know and dont think weve seen the best of him yet but still counts for a lot on the cap which can be used to find serviceable dman maybe even for a year where a lot of good defenseman will be UFAs. If he was signed for 2 years instead of 4 id be okay with but the contract is too long for our team imo. who would you rather trade this offseason?
  15. Kesler never came close to 41 goals besides that one year in 2011. The rest of his career i think podz could definitely be like keslers 20-25 goals 60-70 points.
  16. Appleton would be protected by the canucks
  17. Foote played 35 games for tampa this year makes no sense that hes not ready for next season. Just because they aint playing him this post season dont mean anything for what will happen next season and how they see him as part of their future.
  18. Why should any team help tampa with their cap problem then? They wanna get rid of johnson and his cap hit the most and teams will be expecting something in return to help them you know. Trading cernak and johnson while they still have a huge RHD in foote to replace him while getting picks, prospects and cap relief. How is this dumb on their part? Doing a trade like that and theyre almost under the cap.
  19. Went to bruins board on hf to see what they thought of connor clifton. Most are worried he will be picked by seattle but they aeem to like him a lot. Maybe a deal for him and debrusk is something we should look into more.
  20. Well thats never going to happen so…
×
×
  • Create New...