Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

73 Percent

Members
  • Posts

    19,299
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by 73 Percent

  1. 1 Col 2 SJ 3 Cal 4 Dal 5 Nash 6 Stl 7 Wpg 8 Vgk 9 Van
  2. Reported to mods. I cant handle this bullying and hatred.
  3. You cant criticize cdc members for hatred of dahlen when youre hatreding me
  4. I wonder how what quality of picks/prospects would have to be included to rid ourselves of LE. Would Lind and a mid round do it?
  5. Why are you picking on me. Cdc is supposed to be a friendly place.
  6. I dont lile being bullied. Can you stop bullying me please.
  7. Green wasn't HC when we signed LE
  8. The Las Vegas golden knights are taking the Washington capitals to arbitration? BOLD MOVE
  9. Offensive 1 Hughes 2 Edler 3 Myers 4 Stetcher 5 Benn 6 Fin 7 Markstrom 8 hot dog guy 9 tanev Defensive 1 tanev 2 benn 3 stetcher 4 edler 5 myers 6 hughes I had a really hard time ranking defence. 3-6 are all interchangeable on any given night.
  10. Fine with either side of this view. I'm betting this team makes the show at least 1 of the next 2 years. You're not. Thats fine you're entitled to your own opinion just like Halford. The difference is you don't belittle others for not sharing your opinion. I expect more out of a professional like him over a cdc member. You dont see button or bob say any crap like this. Also them employing writers like this is reason 85386 why I dont pay for the athletic.
  11. As of right now I give them a B+. They earned a B for the moves they made, and the + for not overpaying. If they manage one of these moves I'd bump them up to an A. Move out Erikssons contract Sign Ferland to 4 years or less If they manage both, that's a perfect offseason. A+
  12. Hey thats your opinion and we have to respect that. I'd bet that the canucks make the playoffs at least one of the next two years though. We're definitely not a shoe in, but we were close this year amd trending up.
  13. Looking even better mext year Edler barrie Hughes myers Benn stetcher Juolevi
  14. This is such a pedestrian way to look at it. We're likely giving up a late first and a late 3rd, both of which are no guarantees to produce an nhl player. Lee likely left a bit of money on the table to continue qith the islanders. So if we were to sign him we likely pay 7.5m-8m for the 7 years. He'll be 36 by the time that contract expires. He already isnt the greatest skater. He'll be much slower by 36... making 7.5-8m. Sound like somone you know? Now factor in that Lee's contract comes with a ntc. That contract may be immovable in a few years. Lee is the superior scorer mostly due to his one 40 goal season, but remember he's 3 years older than miller. Take away those top 3 years and you get a 36 and 41 pt season. Miller is closer offensively than you think. So essentially we gave up a late first and a late third, for a player 3 years the younger, 1.75-2.75m cheaper, during all and only his prime years, without any trade clause. That late first is worth not taking a bad contract. Wouldn't you trade a late first to get rid of Eriksson? Because thats pretty much what we did by avoiding signing lee.
  15. The wiki universe is clearly projecting my fantasy world.
  16. Lol the 6% of 100 that "checked in" Bruins Canucks Providence bruins Comets Marlies Wolves
  17. Half a dozen... Thats 6 rick. Say 6. Lets not fluff it up.
  18. Quinn hughes will collect 30-35 pts this year along with a positive +/- Markstrom struggles eventually losing the number 1 job to demko Demko finishes qith a .900-.910 sv% starting over 30 games Only one of brock/EP net more than 30 goals this year. Miller finishes second in team pts Tanev plays 82 games Virtanen scores 20 or more goals Canucks are the second wild card team Canucks lose 4-1 in the first round Edler gets more than 50pts Horvat is a selke finalist
  19. So... Let them. It either hurts them or helps you. Win/win for the team that submits the offer sheet.
×
×
  • Create New...