Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

falcon45ca

Members
  • Posts

    10,951
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by falcon45ca

  1. It's only the 2nd nightfall. Is it not possible the claim is a bait to get a real JOAT claim? Consider that this claim is about a player being mafia that the claimee has been tunneling, but wouldnt lay a vote against until pushed. Also, said vote keeps the votes tied. Vore count anyone?
  2. Why do you assume WWs JOAT claim to be 100% genuine?
  3. Hes exposed himself, unnecessarily. If BJ is TP, then WW is auto mafia, am I right?
  4. BJ was under the radar, tjo hes been mentioned in many scum liste and leans...also, you ain't the one whose been all.on his eggs now have you? That's been WW...and BJ has been flying under the radar...get real.
  5. I'd rather the JOAT not have been claimed...but seeing as only the JOAT has the investigative power (as far as I know, please correct me) then he necessarily claimed JOAT by virtue of claiming he investigated BJ. Or am I.missing something?
  6. Yet you've role claimed, ergo you.must use your doc powers or get MKd. You've effectively, if the true JOAT, screwed yourself...but it is a good play as mafia. Consider: the town won't lynch you out of fear of you actually being the JOAT, the mafia now wont MK you out of fear you'll use your doc power...so I guess you'll do an investigation? This play makes way more sense if you are mafia, not if you're actually the JOAT
  7. There's been 1 round, I believe we are still in the 2nd
  8. So you tunneled him, instead of claim the role & a subsequent investigation, only to call it out the very next round (exposing you as a role)...to what purpose? Are the votes not pretty tight? Pray tell, what have you done this round with your "role" powers? If it's a doc claim after you've not been lynched, forgive me for being suspicious
  9. Are you implying that BJ was investigated by WW Rd1?
  10. "The lady doth protest too much" Its definitely shady. But so is WW
  11. Agreed. Not even the Host knows how you're voting. If you're voting BJ, then vote him. Sitting on the side with a swing vote worries me
  12. WW sitting with posts but no vote this round seems a touch shady right now.
  13. I wonder when BW will pop back in & try to direct the town's lynch
  14. I dont know the vote count, and also I'd the mafia did that it wpud make vote tracking much easier
  15. Dont as of yet see why I should change my vote from WW. TL has looked scummy, as has otherwise, BW, (where is) Kryten, WW Not sure, but a tie may help the town via the JOAT
  16. I didn't say "same time", but yeah in a game like this, 12 mins is pretty darn tight. I believe you brought up timing as an issue before tho, right?
  17. Already have. Already told you I have. So you're comparing G40 convenient timing response about a lynch vote, and me bringing up Krytens absence as the same? You don't know how the KP works, but known the term sheeping? Okie dokie.
×
×
  • Create New...