Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

FlyLow_

Members
  • Posts

    2,236
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by FlyLow_

  1. Love the kids play style, obviously don't love the Russian factor but just glad we drafted size with skill. Biggest need, bar none. Can't trade for it. The Canucks table looked deflated and possibly mad, I'm assuming they were trying to accomplish much more and failed but I'm still good with the pick. Hoping we can pick up ville heinola with our 2nd.
  2. Can I draft krebs sister for future considerations?
  3. That is 1000% how it would go down. Take it to the bank.
  4. I'll take fighting over a wet fart that whines about ice time.
  5. I don't get why people want to trade next year's pick. This year's draft is ass, Byram doesn't even go 8-15 last year nevermind next year.
  6. Rather go for risto if we are going that route. At least he will kill somebody and is under contract.
  7. The Blues definitely called Bettman's bluff on becoming a more skill based league. The thing about all these new rules to make the league more exciting and skill based, they don't work when you throw them out day 1 of the playoffs. Cheap shot your way to the cup is where it's at.
  8. If we don't start drafting some size with skill we're going nowhere important
  9. Was all set to buy one until I saw that the ones in store have a god awful 50 logo on them
  10. Boldy seems like a great fit for our group. Size and skill on the wing, the very thing we've needed forever. If he's not there and nobody drops that's too good to pass up, trade back a bit and pick up Soderstrom or Seider. Or package the pick for a need. Not crazy about this draft to be honest.
  11. If all of this rumoured activity ends up with Schenn on our 3rd pairing I don't think any of it matters.
  12. That grin Matthews has on the cover is the exact grin the Developers have when they copy and paste the same game every year.
  13. Or the guy that actually played in a real mens league and is better?
  14. You are mostly on point, except Marleau has a full NMC and would only agree to the trade if we buy him out. Marleau will only agree to waive in T.O. to go back to the Sharks. The Leafs have to find a willing partner to trade him to that will buy him out for them so San Jose can afford to sign him. I'd be all over that to get Kapanen on the cheap, probably for less than your offer but they can't take salary back so Hutton doesn't work. https://www.nbcsports.com/bayarea/sharks/nhl-rumors-patrick-marleau-only-wants-trade-sharks-maple-leafs
  15. Thank Christ. Getting rid of Guddy and now this, making me a happy fella. Now if we can just get rid of Sutter, Goldobin and I know it's too much to ask but maybe Eriksson.
  16. Agree 100%, concussions are no joke. A shot to the head 5 games into his career is not good at all. And the circumstances are unacceptable.
  17. This is why I wanted Zack MacEwen on the team. He's been one of Utica's best players so far, put granny at Center and call up the big fella.
  18. He is slow, yet another case of bulking up gone wrong.
  19. If he could be a great 3rd liner that can move up the line-up when needed, I'd be thrilled. I don't think that's unrealistic.
×
×
  • Create New...