Where's Wellwood

Don't wear it out. I'm content now. What can I say?

I"m out for a while. Finally played a game where I was able to portray my TP-ness, and that's enough for me.

Maybe I saw a particularly bad professionalism day for Louie then. The game I saw, he would not stop talking about his son.

The team members may change, but the owner Jeremy Jacobs remains the same. The commentator Jack Edwards remains the same. The fans remain the same. The same fans who booed Raymond when his back was broken. The same fans who cheered the sandbagging of Sedin. They are the same. And I feel that with a core that has included players like Marchand, Lucic, and Tim Thomas, the dressing room doesn't suddenly get all squeaky clean. When McAvoy, and Pastrnak publicly call out Marchand for some of his BS, I'll respect them. Until then, they're guilty by association. When you hang out with the asshole, chances are you either are or become an asshole yourself. And I'll never like Jake DeBrusk because of Louie DeBrusk's constant talking about his son on CBC. They should not allow Louie DeBrusk to work on games involving the Bruins. How hard is that? Just like Colin Campbell should have never been involved in anything involving the Bruins. And I don't care that he was 'removed' for the Stanley Cup Finals, he should have been distanced far sooner than that. If Marchand is the only thing remaining that keeps Boston as your most hated team, then I've gotta say, your hate never ran as deep as mine.

Now the Flames have an Elias and a Pettersen

IS THERE A DPS? I'D LIKE TO SEE IT TOO

CLUTCH

LETS SEE IT

THIS ALMOST FEELS SELF REFERENTIAL. I'LL BE THINKING ABOUT THAT IF THIS GOES DEEP FOR NOW I'LL VOTE INTOEWS SINCE THERE'S NO GREATER REASON FOR TL OVER TOEWS VOTE TOEWS

The original video is titled with Makar listed first but we can't have that. Quinn bought some roller blades to stay in the feel of skating. He's never been off the ice this long ever. Makar talks about seeing Hughes for the first time at 6:25

WHAT WAS YOUR ACTION LAST NIGHT?

BEFORE BLOWING UP, ZFETCH CHOSE TO LIST ME AS LIKELY WOLF BECAUSE LL PUT ME ON A LIST. WITH LL DEAD, AND ZFETCH WITH ONE FOOT IN THE GRAVE (AT THAT POINT) WOULD HE REALLY BUS HIS LAST MEMBER. I STILL THINK ITS SOMEBODY LESS ACTIVE. WHY NOT TRY TO TAKE OUT FALCON LAST NIGHT WHEN A PLAYER PAYING ATTENTION KNEW YOU COULDN'T SAVE HIM AGAIN? I THINK MR KNOWS THE ROLE MECHANICS ENOUGH COULD BE TL OR TOEWS CRAZY CONSPIRACY THEORY: WHAT IF LL AND ZFETCH SACRIFICED THEMSELVES TO MAKE FALCON SUPER TOWN LOCK THINKING THAT WAS THEIR BEST OPTION IN A 1-TO-5 WOLF:TOWN RATIO GAME? WE KNOW NO JOAT IS DEAD BECAUSE FULL ROLE IS REVEALED IN THE NIGHTFALL, SO IF FALC OR GC IS FAKING, SOMEBODY OUT THERE KNOWS

I WAS HOPING ZFETCH WOULD SAY MORE BUT ITS COME TO A STANDSTILL VOTE ZFETCH

for a while the TP couldnt win a game to save their lives (there were a ton of cults at the time). Also realized I forgot to turn capslock on but I don't want to retype it all so blah

IT DOESN'T. THE JOAT DOESN'T TRIGGER MOTION THAT THEY DETECT

SO ITS IF ZFETCH VISITED OR WAS VISITED. SO HE EITHER SUBMITTED THE KILL, IS ACTUALLY A JOAT AND VISITED SOMEONE, OR GC VISITED HIM. WAIT, THIS WOULD BE DUMB BUT DOES THE MOTION DETECTOR ALWAYS RETURN A POSITIVE RESULT SINCE IT DETECTS IF THE TARGETS VISITS OR IS VISITED. BUT THE JOAT IS VISITING THEM? @Ceres CAN YOU CONFIRM THAT THE JOAT VISITING THE TARGET DOESN'T TRIGGER A POSITIVE MOTION DETECTOR RESULT?

GC WOULD BE A BALLSY PICK. COULD CONFIRM EITHER LIAR OR JOAT

HE LISTED ME BECAUSE HE WAS DOGGING AFTER THE FACT THAT I LEFT A WHOLE BUNCH OF WHITE SPACE IN A POST I DIRECTED AT CERES. FOR EXAMPLE: *SNARKY COMMENT* JK, LOLZ IF YOU FOUND SOMETHING, PROBABLY KURISU

I'M GOING TO WORK NOW. I'LL BE BACK AROUND WHAT WOULD HAVE BEEN THE ORIGINAL NIGHTFALL.

EXACTLY. BUT GC IS A NEW PLAYER WHO MIGHT JUST BE FRUSTRATED BY THE INSTANT BELIEF WE HAVE IN A CLAIM AND IS TRYING TO PROVE A POINT. IT'S BE A BAD THING TO DO. IF GC WASN'T NEW, I WOULDN'T EVEN CONSIDER IT

I DON'T SEE WHY GC WOULD COME OUT NOW. I FIRST CONSIDERED THAT IT WAS JUST A PLOY TO TRY TO PROVE THAT FALCON WAS LYING. LIKE, GC DIDN'T BELIEVE FALCON, SO BY CLAIMING JOAT EVEN THOUGH HE'S NOT, IF WE BELIEVE HIM, IT WOULD LEND CREDENCE TO THE FACT THAT FALCON COULD ALSO BE CLAIMING EVEN THOUGH HE'S NOT

I'd forgotten Lucic did that. POS!

I don't respect Patrice Bergeron for his hypocrisy. No way a guy who played with a hole in his lung (in 2013, I believe) should get as bothered as he did by Burrows' bite. The bite was on his glove and he shows his ungloved finger to the ref as if there would be teeth marks to see. Come on! &^@# Bergeron for that.

NO THOUGHTS ON THIS? MAYBE THE OTHER TWO WOLVES ARE INACTIVES? OR THE WOLVES SUBMITTED THEIR ACTION EARLY AND THEY NEVER THOUGHT TO CHANGE THE KILL SUBMITTER ONCE LL HARD CLAIMED LATE IN THE ROUND?

ONE THING IS ODD THOUGH. WHY WOULD THE WOLVES LET LL SUBMIT THE KILL WHEN HE HAD HARD CLAIMED. SURELY, THEY THOUGHT THAT ONE OF THE JOAT'S WOULD TRACK LL THAT NIGHT