Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Gollumpus

Members
  • Posts

    7,291
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Gollumpus

  1. Oh come on. No one on that team played... regards, G. PS - McCallum? I didn't go back that far in my looking up names and faces.
  2. Well, I'm stumped. I don't know this guy from Al Milliar. regards, G.
  3. With those pads, he looks like he plays cricket. regards, G.
  4. But I'm in the correct century, yes? regards, G.
  5. Easy one, that's Number 11 aka, "He Who Shall Not Be Named Cuz He's a Dick and I'm Glad He Left". regards, G.
  6. I was originally going to say George Gardner, but I talked myself out of it. From his days in the CPHL. regards, G.
  7. Oh, sorry. Canucks' prospects? regards, G.
  8. Wellwood is in that picture? regards, G.
  9. Gillis could trade for him. The NYR traded for Michel Bergeron back in '87. regards, G.
  10. Adopt, adapt and improve! So, Gillis and Gilman should sneak down to LA and put the grab on Sutter? regards, G.
  11. He was a calming influence, I will give Salo that. As to hitting the net: Salo has 2 goals on 27 shots, 7.4 shooting percentage in 24 games. Garrison has 4 goals on 42 shots. 9.5% shooting percentage in 25 games. regards, G.
  12. Well, Ehrhoff did manage to get an entire pre-season in before he became effective immediately. regards, G.
  13. Yup, so this one game makes Garrison a terrible signing? Your comments do nothing to support your position. You cherry pick one game, and base an analysis of an entire season which isn't even half over, on that one result. It's nice to see that you acknowledge your short comings in the area of comprehending how the +/- stat can be a misleading figure. The results of the Detroit game do not change the analysis in my previous posts. Salo being on a higher scoring team gives him a much better chance at having a higher +/- stat, while Garrison being on an under-achieving offensive team will have a better chance at having a lower +/-. Further, Garrison's contribution to the Canucks looks to be paying off in higher team results, rather than Salo's higher offensive contribution is paying off for TB. Let's try another +/- stat. Vancouver Canucks are +6. TB is 0. The Canucks also look to be in a much better position to improve on their +/- stat with the return of Kesler and Booth, and with Garrison and other Canucks starting to pick up theri scoring. I always stand while watching Canucks games. It helps me get a head start jumping on or off the band-wagon as it goes by... regards, G.
  14. Oh you guys and your annoying facts and rules and stuff. But at the end of the game, he was still even. So there. regards, G.
  15. Yeah, if I recall, people used to say that about that Ballard guy. I also have a recollection that Salo had some question marks about him when he first got here. regards, G.
  16. Couldn't have been on for 4 against. The boxscore indicates that he was "0" for the game. If the Canucks only scored 3 goals then the most that Garrison could have been on for is 3. Not disputing that he had a bad game (like a lot of other guys), just pointing out an inaccuracy. regards, G.
×
×
  • Create New...