-
Posts
7,291 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Everything posted by Gollumpus
-
Assuming he passes the physical, Chychrun. No doubt. It also depends on what "extra" means in this case. I do figure a 1st is in the mix, as well as some other prospects etc. How many scoring guys do the Canucks need on the left side? Chychrun can fill that bill, and to my mind he can also do things which Dahlin can't (do as well... probably). And he costs less (on his current contract). If the Canucks do go after Dahlin, they may as well trade Hughes (or try to convince Ekman-Larsson to waive, and then send him somewhere with a 50% retention ++). The team could also insert Rathbone in place of Hughes, because Rathbone is such a prolific scorer... regards, D.
-
[Rumour] Coyotes gauging market on Jakob Chychrun
Gollumpus replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
Well (lol) I am only going by what others have posted in the past (lol), or are currently posting (lol). And it's not only for potential trades to Arizona (lol), but to other trade scenarios (lol) involving multiple trade partners... (lol). regards, G. -
[PGT] Vancouver Canucks at San Jose Sharks | Dec. 16, 2021
Gollumpus replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Canucks Talk
He probably did as good a job at that than several other guys currently on the Sharks' active roster could have done, and for several million less per season. regards, G. -
[PGT] Vancouver Canucks at San Jose Sharks | Dec. 16, 2021
Gollumpus replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Canucks Talk
regards, G. -
I like Kami Band (the back up band for the singers) I find the vocalists to be too much like hamsters on speed. This being said, other Japanese performers/groups which I do like (these can all be found in "White Noise").: Majiko - great vocalist. Drop's - a nice bluesy sound Hump Back - a Ramones kind of feel regards, G,
-
[Rumour] Coyotes gauging market on Jakob Chychrun
Gollumpus replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
If indeed Chychrun is up for grabs, I'd make sure that the team got a full medical. * no moving Pearson or Ekman-Larsson, unless they waive. * cap considerations will have to be taken into account As to assets which could be moved: - the Canucks' 1st for this year - Carolina's 3rd for this year - Rathbone - Lockwood - DiPietro (forgot to add him) - Gadj.... nvm Deal broadeners: These could be necessary depending on the cap issues. As has previously been noted, the Canucks can't take on Chychrun's contract without losing cap. - Boeser(?), but if he were included then I'd be looking to broaden the deal to get more back from Arizona (they toss in a 2nd for a 3rd, or something like that). Further, there would be a reduced package going to Arizona (lesser/fewer picks and/or prospects) and perhaps a few more parts coming back. This does solve the cap considerations. - Dickinson. Takes a chunk out of the cap issues. I'd rather not part with this guy (as with Boeser), but .... - maybe picks from next year (perhaps not the 1st, but it could be a possibility depending on other assets given up) - Ferland's LITR(?) regards, G. -
I like the story about Fraser v. Gretzky, and how Fraser refused to call penalties on supposed dives by Gretzky. Good for a chuckle. https://thehockeynews.com/news/when-kerry-fraser-went-to-war-with-wayne-gretzky regards, G.
-
[Report] Canucks hire Derek Clancey as assistant GM
Gollumpus replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Canucks Talk
In a Machiavellian sense, Rutherford also gets a trusted lieutenant and sounding board in the room for meetings which he (JR) might not otherwise be in attendance. This could be useful if the successful candidate for the new GM job is someone who is not a trusted associated who has previously worked with Rutherford. regards, G. -
There's (likely) always been a lot of back and forth between officials and players. In the video below we can see/hear Kerry Fraser hit someone with a great burn, all in fun of course. Go to about 1:25: regards, G.
-
Yeah him, or Gadj..... nvm. regards, G.
-
Yup. This seems to be good for all concerned, especially Boeser. Horvat seems to be doing well, as is Miller, and Pearson. Yup, but in Pearson's case he has a NTC for this year, and a M-NTC for next year, so I don't see him being traded this season unless he absolutely wants to be traded. Well, this being said, have you noted the role that Pearson has played in these last four games. He has set up goals, or placed himself in a position where where he can gain possession of the puck, which leads to scoring chances, if not goals (by Boeser and Miller). I agree. I suppose my issue in this thread is that the argument against Pearson (mostly) seems to be people complaining about his contract, and not necessarily his play. Pearson had no input on his contract other than agreeing to the sum his agent put before him (ie. blame Benning). Pearson does not decide his TOI, or who he has as line mates. If this is a concern for someone then they should complain to the coach. Otherwise, in these last four games, Pearson has played pretty well, based on the success of Boeser and Miller (in which Pearson has played some part). regards, G.
-
Okay, so what do we do about this menace? Forcing his way into the top-6! Why doesn't someone bring this to the attention of the GM, that this player is pushing the coach around and getting undeserved top-6 TOI? And while we're at it, why doesn't someone tell Rutherford about this guy's contract? Maybe get him to give back $1 million, or whatever they feel is appropriate? regards, G.
-
Sounds kind of ironic. regards, G.
-
I can't say that I'd describe Pearson as a front of net kind of guy (in that traditional sense). He seems to be taking up a spot to the left of the goalie, and from there he collects rebounds and passes, which he then dishes off to other players, like Boeser. regards, G.
-
So, Pearson is awful because you (and some others) don't like his contract. Got it. regards, G.
-
I can't say that Dickinson has ever shown an offensive flair, so I'm going to suggest that he will continue to be a bottom-6 kind of guy. Pearson has shown a couple of instances where he broke 20+ goals in a season. Aside from people not liking his contract, I don't see anyone (currently) associated with the team replacing Pearson in his middle-6 role. regards, G.
-
And here I thought we were friends... I don't recall saying that Pearson was *the* reason for Boeser currently getting his scoring touch back. but I did note that, "Pearson seems to be a factor in Boeser getting his scoring touch back". Now, other factors in this are the changes brought in by the new coach, how that has affected Boeser (and the entire team), how well Miller is playing with Boeser and Pearson and so on. Is Pearson (sometimes) iinconsistent? Yup. Is he the only guy on the team who seems to suffer from this malady? Nope (eg. Pettersson or Boeser). Other guys get a pass for inconsistent play, mostly because they are the current darling of a portion of the fanbase (eg. Pettersson or Boeser). This is cool, and these sorts of opinion will always be around. Did you (or anyone else) notice Pearson's play in that LA game when it came to the that goal by Boeser? The one where he snuck down deep to the goalie's left side in order to receive a pass from Miller, and then Pearson waited a moment for the traffic to clear from around Boeser, before sending him a crisp pass for the goal? Pearson has demonstrated a (usually good) situational awareness, for example the first goal of the game (by Boeser) against Carolina. As to being a step behind, has Boeser been playing (almost) every shift with Miller/Pearson because he plays at the Boudreau pace? Is Pearson overrated? Perhaps. Is Pearson the most overrated player on the team? Arguments could be made to the contrary. If a guy is expected to score 30+ goals in a season, and he only gets 20+ goals in a season, is he overrated? If a guy gets third to 2nd line tweener point production, is he overrated or is he doing what is expected of him? The bolded part above pretty much sums up your position, regardless of whatever you type here. In your opinion (and others), Pearson is being paid too much for where he plays and what he does. Cool. I don't see why there is this hate for some players for the contract they sign. Player Name's contract was a "WTF?" moment for me, and he really didn't live up to that deal based on what might have been expected of him (20+ goals/50+ assists playing with the Sedins). On the other hand, Pearson wasn't expected to be anything more than a third line guy that could fill in on the 2nd line until someone better came along. Did Pearson hold a gun to Benning's head (ala Don Corleone) and force him to sign a contract? Nope. From what I'm seeing, all of the position(s) against Pearson appear to come down to, "IDON'TLIKEHIMBECAUSEITHINKHEGETSPAIDTOOMUCHMONEY!". With the above in mind, who gets put in Pearson's place in the top-6, and will suddenly spring forth and score 30+ goals in a season? Perhaps even a mere 20+ goals? Who is better? Dickinson? Motte? Lockwood (maybe next season)? regards, G.
-
Well, he's doing pretty good for a middle six tweener. If there are complaints about his contract/cap hit, then go talk to Benning about that. Pearson seems to be a factor in Boeser getting his scoring touch back, and he also plays well with Miller, so an argument can be made that Pearson is the catalyst of that line for the last four games. Look at the first goal of the LA game, which started the current streak. https://www.nhl.com/gamecenter/lak-vs-van/2021/12/06/2021020386#game=2021020386,game_state=final I do see Pearson being undervalued around here. regards, G. PS - back in a bit. Need breakfast, and I should do something about my empty fridge/cupboards.