Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

DrChill

Members
  • Posts

    2,049
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DrChill

  1. I agree with this. I also think that the deal will be for Tanev+ instead of Edler
  2. ROR has played wing most of the season to great success and can play center... Such a terrible problem..... 2way player with good offensive instincts. Yup would be terrible to get that for our top6 Tutalledge of Kesler for him would be awesome, he is a younger Kesler with more offensive upside... ROR Kesler Kassian would be a great second line. 200-202-214 lbs Fast
  3. Disagree, Although I do believe if we get ROR it will probably be for Tanev+
  4. I hate to say it but I think you are right. Tanev, picks and prospects will be the deal
  5. If you buy out Booth, just extra 2.3 million, yes that much better, expecially if you give him an extension for less than 6.5 longterm.
  6. Don't think Schroeder will shine that brightly in the west. But agree with your point about another stronger bottom six helping top six. Still want some top six help if possible
  7. Interesting this year we got a 3rd c that has played great. Problem is that our top wingers are missing so he has had to move up to second line winger. Great job by gillis getting him too. If not for the Maljoltra injury we would have him as a 3rd c still. It happens
  8. Maybe they are saying Canucks are looking for top 9, not that we need top 9. All canuck fans agree we need top 6 winger
  9. Shouldn't have that many untouchables on that bad of a team
  10. Prefer him in top 9 and get us a real top 6 player. But until then he will do just fine
  11. Yes more space but will we use it for a 2nd/1st liner ufa? Trade etc? Tanev signing long term at decent rate. Alberts back? Santi new deal?
  12. They weren't worried about him on a PP. They were worried about his Defensive play. When and if he comes back, he needs to play defense well. If he is in I assume he would get at least 2nd unit to start
  13. Disagree especially in last year good gm
  14. I would do a swap with booth, add in a low pick or low prospect.
  15. They don't attract people that much, but anyone they get seems to stay.
  16. Then change to non mobile view......
  17. I like him but am unsure where he fits on this team right now. Honestly for the benefit of both team and player I feel like we should trade him. Unless he fits in somewhere that I can't see. Richardson I think has 3c locked in, 2line winger, booth and burrows. Higgy and Hansen are locks as 3rd line wingers and 4th line I would think isn't a good spot for him.
  18. I don't think using our youth is a step back! I think it is a move forward if done right! That is the question, and we won't know until we try!
  19. Word is the Sedins were on board with Torts being offered the job, so take them out of that category for sure.
×
×
  • Create New...