I'm a huge Bertuzzi fan (he was my favourite player as a kid), but I'm not sure he was really around here long enough or dominant for enough years to merit that honour. All of the players currently in the ROH played for Vancouver much longer than Bert did (except Kurtenbach). To me, he'd be on the fringe of making it. I wouldn't be strongly against it, but I would be fine with leaving him out.
Kurtenbach was voted in because he was the first captain.
Quinn was voted in more as a GM and Coach than as a player.
McLean was a goaltender and goalies play fewer games than skaters.
The closest comparable to Bertuzzi is Gradin, and that's where maybe a case could be made, but even Gradin played more games. Bert's first season was really only the final 22 games of the 1997-98 season. If Bertuzzi makes it in, he just barely makes it in, as his longevity doesn't really stack up to that of other players.
Kind of hurts to say since I love the guy so much, but feelings can't get in the way of facts.
EDIT: Upon further reflection, he is closer to Gradin than I really realized and although his Canucks career points-per-game is lower (and thus his total points significantly lower (101 points fewer than Gradin)), it's worth noting the different in offense between the early 80s and the early 2000s. There may actually be a case here.
The other case some may put up against him is that the hit on Moore would exclude him from any honour, but I myself would disagree with that. He made a stupid decision, but he apologized and life has moved on. No point on hanging a guy's entire career on one dumb mistake. If he's kept out of the ROH, I'd rather it be due to his performance, longevity, and impact than a single bad moment.