Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

CanucksLegacy

Members
  • Posts

    1,148
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CanucksLegacy

  1. He told me right before 9:30 that if he wasn't saved, to out your name. It was agreed between you two, you'd save him. What else am I suppose to do?
  2. My guess is either kumar, Lemons, or GFY was the serial killer. Earlier today, Kesler87 told me that the doctor had indeed PM'd him and intended to save him. It didn't happen, as otherwise he would still be alive right now. The doctor's name....Dral. Oh yea since we have to red and bold votes: Vote CanucksLegacy (If you missed it, earlier I told kumar if he ended TP I'd vote for myself) For people on mobile here's the code That's all I got.
  3. Twinblade is priority is it not? Doc didn't save Kes originally I'm guessing. Aladeen clarification? I have details I'd like to share.
  4. I forgot, is the Lackey in this game? Also, I told kumar if he was tp I'd vote for myself so... Vote CanucksLegacy On mobile so can't red it
  5. Yea, I basically tried to catch him in a lie. Instead he hesitated checking saying he was too lazy.
  6. We're not "so sure" he's mafia. Like I said, for me, he's my best bet at the moment after what happened in the chat. A number of the most recent joined in after kumar made his comments making him, as you predicted, more suspicious.
  7. I originally suspected GFY for saying (jokingly?) "I'm mafia" seeing as how last game he said "in b4 Kes thinks I'm mafia" (decided to TB him after this, an inking feeling). GFY ended up Mafia that time. The odds GFY's mafia again (3-4 straight games?) are slim so yea, kumar's my best bet at the moment. Nobody has stuck out from the bandwagon votes (atleast to me).
  8. Basically, yesterday I asked kumar if he got a PM (I was under the assumption he wouldn't know/wasn't paying attention to the fact that Aladeen PMs everyone, and if he said no, it would've been an obvious lie). He was hesitant to check, said he was too lazy to login CDC and check. He left afterwards because he is Eastern timezone and it was 10-11pm his time iirc. Fast forward to today, again asked him if he got a PM and it took a while to get a response "yes". Accused him of Mafia, and usually we would get a "wtf no, I'm TP" "idiots" response. This time he was fairly quiet, not forming any sort of rebuttal which is typically out of character. It could be he doesn't trust us after what Kes has done to him in previous games, though he did trust us last game that if we were Mafia, we wouldn't tell the Mafia he was sheriff (luckily for him, I ended up TB and Kes ended up TP). That a good enough summary? I left out a lot of expletives but you guys prolly get the gist of it.
  9. Vote kumar2013 Gave him ample opportunity to explain himself today. He hasn't and he's just been dodgy of questions. Unless that changes/someone better shows up, I'll be sticking to my vote.
  10. Suspicious meme by a suspicious mafia player, JE14 is mafia - e5
  11. Suspicious meme by a suspicious mafia player, JE14 is mafia - e5
  12. He said he didn't check and that he was too lazy, come on at least get the facts right. Kinda suspicious he didn't want to check but that's bout it Plus it's kumar, his resume speaks for itself lol
  13. If sheriff doesn't trust Kes, I'm willing to be spokesperson. Feel free to investigate me. If you don't trust me then, o well.
  14. It was an idea I felt might work for a Town Drunk . You guys can feel free to tweak it however you like
  15. I was thinking randomly selecting 2 TP and 1 random mafia, then giving the list to the town drunk. Tell the town drunk 2 truths 1 lie, but obviously 1 has to be a lie. Reiterating the idea: Scenario A is Mafia -> A is Mafia B is TP -> B is TP C is TP -> C is Mafia Or you could list them all all TP, in which case A would be the lie. When I originally thought of it, I meant it to be one time use since it guaranteed the identity of at least 1 mafia. "Do they submit three names to me, I tell the truth on *two* and lie about the other *one*?" ^I think that's a bit overpowered unless it's a one time use. If the TP do it right, they confirm identities of atleast 2 TPs, narrowing the search by 2 people. Really depends on how the information is utilized.
×
×
  • Create New...